Because of it's maintenance, huge place, power consumption more and also the organization should have enough data to process for such a large computer.
Read more: Why_do_you_think_that_only_a_few_organizations_have_a_supercomputer
Because of it's maintenance, huge place, power consumption more and also the organization should have enough data to process for such a large computer.
As of 2013, Rwanda does not have a supercomputer yet, and its technological lag will probably prevent the country from having one for a few more years.
I think only for a few hours though I think.
Cray's first supercomputer was the CDC 6600 in 1964. The IBM 7030 Stretch (1961), UNIVAC LARC (1960), and IBM NORC (1954) supercomputers had preceded it but few of them were ever made and they were not really considered very successful.
Yes, but only a few people can do spells.
I think that only a few insects were alive
A supercomputer is a very fast computer. A computer that uses few instructions and runs them quickly is considered a RISC computer.
Unfortunately, very few people, much less organizations helped them. The Danes were undoubtedly the only ones that actually helped them. Only organization-wise I mean.
i think only for about a few years
An Isotope- I think
no kicking, no punching, no contact with the face. I think those are only a few
No, it should be "only a few know", because "only a few" is plural and requires a plural verb. You would say "Bill and Julia know", "the three of them know", and "the others know", so you would also say "only a few know". Example: "Most of my classmates think I've been hiding something, but only a few know what it is."
There are very few real life examples of nonagons. The only examples that I can think of are a few coins.