An argument against
Most likely because the slavery of the Hebrews and the Exodus was not a historical event, it did not happen. There are no historical or archaeological record outside The Bible that this event were recorded; not only from the Egyptians, but also from nearby civilization. 400,000 Hebrews wandering the desert for 40 years must have been noticed and recorded by those living in the desert.
An argument for
I refer the respondent to the following:
The Amarna period
It is true of Egyptian history that the Old Kingdom was the time of the construction of the great pyramids. This period was the time that the Egyptian civilization was at its peak.
No, the Old Kingdom period in Egyptian history was way, way before Cleopatra's time. Cleopatra ruled in the Hellinistic or Ptolemaic period of Egyptian history.
Ancient Egypt is a period of time that started around 3150 BC. This period in Egyptian history reaches until around 332 BC. 332 BC is when the Classical Antiquity period of Egyptian history begins.
It was when Pharaohs did infact not exist in this time of history
It lasted 3100-3000BC.
The 3rd dynasty began the Middle Kingdom period in Egyptian History.
No, the Old Kingdom in Egyptian history was thousands of years before Cleopatra. Cleopatra ruled in the Hellenistic period of Egyptian history.
The Old Kindom
i have thw same question
Yes.
Don't knowY