Want this question answered?
bush doctrine
Why are tariffs needed to protect our young industries
pretty much because it isn't entirely true that LBJ had no choice but to go to war. It's often argued that due to domestic reasons (his great society program), "domino theory" in south east asia, to protect the credibility of the US and lessons learnt from WW2 all meant he had no choice. Fredrik Logevall argues against this by saying all those reasons were hyped up and LBJ practically just took matters into his own hands cause of his ego. I personally think Robert Dallek offers a better answer saying it wasn't so much the decision to go to war that cemented the term but more so his playing with the media and not allowing public debate. Do a bit of research on LBJ's personality and it kind of answers itself really.
"It has been argued by some that it is a fallacy to consider the reparations as the primary source of the economic condition in Germany from 1919 to 1939. This perspective argues that Germany paid a small portion of the reparations and the hyper-inflation of the early 1920s was a result of the political and economic instability of the Weimar Republic. In fact, the occupation of the Ruhr by the French (which began when Germany failed to supply a required delivery of telegraph poles) did more damage to the economy than the reparations payments"Source - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_reparationsSo, arguably, since one of Hitler's main stances was fixing the German economy, and a large hit to said economy came as a result of a failure of the Germans to deliver promised telegraph poles, it can be said - to a degree - that telegraph poles were the case of World War 2.
When 5-star general Dwight D. Eisenhower witnessed the liberation of Ohrdruf concentration camp, he knew people would deny it and he wanted the entire camp filmed. Today, there are some people who deny the Holocaust; all of them are anti-Semitic and hate Jews for one reason or another.
He argues that the Court has not protected teachers' and students rights for 50 years.
He argues that the Court has not protected teachers' and students' right for 50 years (apex)
He argues that the Court has not protected teachers' and students' right for 50 years (apex)
he argues that the court has not protected teachers' and students' rights for 50 years. -apex
HELP ME!!!!!!!!!! pwease
policy
The author argues against rights for women by claiming that women are biologically inferior to men and are better suited for roles such as homemaking and child-rearing. They may also argue that granting women rights would disrupt the natural order of society and lead to chaos.
An "anti-imperialist" stance is one that argues which of the following? a) For the control of other nations through acquisition or other means. b) For a government in which people are ruled by a king. c) Against the control of other nations through acquisition or other means. d) Against a government in which people are ruled by a king
Procedural defenses are legal defenses that focus on issues related to the procedures followed in a legal case rather than the actual facts or merits of the case. Examples include lack of jurisdiction, improper service of process, and failure to state a claim. These defenses can result in the dismissal of a case if found to be valid.
The word argue is already a verb because it is an action.Other verbs depending on the tense are argues, arguing and argued.Some example sentences are:"I will argue against this"."He argues for the ban on guns"."They are arguing next door again"."We argued last night".
Answer this question… It argues that the United States supports Israel's plans to oppress Muslims.
Answer this question… It argues that the United States supports Israel's plans to oppress Muslims.