pretty much because it isn't entirely true that LBJ had no choice but to go to war. It's often argued that due to domestic reasons (his great society program), "domino theory" in south east Asia, to protect the credibility of the US and lessons learnt from WW2 all meant he had no choice. Fredrik Logevall argues against this by saying all those reasons were hyped up and LBJ practically just took matters into his own hands cause of his ego. I personally think Robert Dallek offers a better answer saying it wasn't so much the decision to go to war that cemented the term but more so his playing with the media and not allowing public debate. Do a bit of research on LBJ's personality and it kind of answers itself really.
the cold war was not exactly a war but it was between the United States and Russia.
Yes, but unlike the Vietnam War, snipers in the Civil War were often referred to as Sharpshooters.
1914 to 1918 and 1939 to 1945 These are the most common years referred to.... I was born in 1941 Any children born in these time periods are referred to as war babies
no
Pavuvu
War took the front page, not his social programs.
Medicare, medicaid, war on poverty
The Economic Opportunity Act came first.
Social Legislation slowed down because of the cost of Vietnam. (Apex)
no
measures to provide healthcare for those in need
resented that he esculated the war
Lyndon Johnson greatly escalated America's involvement in the Vietnam War.
fasle
Johnsons Air was created in 1996.
The Johnsons was created on 1992-02-14.
The Johnsons No apostrophes needed anywhere.