0
Why does Hubble's Law imply that the universe had to have had a beginning?
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The implication of hubbles law is that the universe is?
That it is expanding.
What does Hubbles law tell us about the beginning of the universe?
It shows that in the past, galaxies were closer together; also, it suggests - as is commonly believed nowadays - that some time in the past, all matter in the Universe was very close together, in a very hot and dense state.
According to hubbles law galaxies are retreating from earth at speed that is proportional to their?
distance
How do the laws of thermodynamics support that the universe came from nothing?
They don't. What they do support is that the Universe must have had a beginning. This is because, according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, there are irreversible processes in nature - the Universe can't remain the way it is forever.
what law states that any 2 objects in the universe attract each other?
The law of universal gravitation.
The implication of hubbles law is that the universe is?
That it is expanding.
What is is hubbles law?
Hubble's Law states that (more or less) the distance to a galaxy is a constant multiple of the distance to that galaxy. For example, if one galaxy is moving away from us at three times the speed of another galaxy, then that means it is also three times as far away. The Law indicates that the Universe is expanding and had a beginning. Before Hubble's Law, many astronomers thought that the Universe did not have a beginning (it always existed).
How old is the universe in 2011?
By using a therom call hubbles law and hubbles constant this is the calculation: 1/Ho=d/v=t t= 3.09x10 22/71000x31566926 t=13.738 billion years old
What does Hubbles law tell us about the beginning of the universe?
It shows that in the past, galaxies were closer together; also, it suggests - as is commonly believed nowadays - that some time in the past, all matter in the Universe was very close together, in a very hot and dense state.
Do the stars in the milky way galaxy obey Hubbles law?
Sometimes
According to hubbles law galaxies are retreating from earth at speed that is proportional to their?
distance
How do the laws of thermodynamics support that the universe came from nothing?
They don't. What they do support is that the Universe must have had a beginning. This is because, according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, there are irreversible processes in nature - the Universe can't remain the way it is forever.
What is the second of thermodynamics and what does it imply?
The Second Law of Thermodynamics means that useful energy is continuously converted into useless energy. In other words, there are irreversible processes in the Universe. One important implication is that the Universe can't have existed forever, nor can it sustain life forever in the future.
What does the PatriotAct of 2001 imply?
That law enforcement officials can easily access your emails
Who had a theory of the law of the universe but was wrong?
Lots of people have wrong theories about the Universe.
Why is the universal law of gravitation universal?
The law applies to everything in the universe.
What is the scientific evidence of creation?
This is a great question that needs to be asked more often. To start it's practically impossible for the universe to have exploded out of nothing or for it to be infinite. The second law of thermodynamics essentially states that there is a limited amount of energy in the universe and that it is being used up. Now the universe could not have existed forever simply because there just isn't that much energy in the universe. If the universe was infinite then it wouldn't be here. If the universe wasn't created than it has to be infinite, which is an impossibility. Here is a similar reason that creation id true. This is called the cosmological argument: 1. Everything that had a beginning had a cause 2. The universe had a beginning 3. Therefore the universe had a cause. Now the first statement cannot be refuted. It's called the Law of Causality. It is a fundamental principle of science that everything that exists/had a beginning has a cause. The second statement is what I just proved in the first paragraph. A limited amount of energy proves that the universe had e beginning. Because those two statements are true the third statement must logically be true as well. We also know that the universe is expanding. This is proved by General Relativity. Now if the universe is expanding, and it is, it only makes sense that it started expanding at some point in time. If the universe was infinite it would be infinitely spread apart and it's quite clear that such is not the case.
