The earth has atmosphere and liquid water, whereas Mercury has neither. Their
presence works against the appearance of impact craters in at least two ways:
1). The vast majority of material objects on a course to strike the earth burn up
in the atmosphere and never reach the surface. Those that are large enough to
survive the entry are reduced in size, mass, and speed before impact.
2). The marks left by impacts that do occur become worn down or "weathered"
by the effects of both the atmosphere and the water on earth.
the moon and mercury don't have an atmosphere and the earth has liquid water
It's mass is less
The vast majority of lunar craters are caused by meteor impacts.
Unlike Mercury of the moon, Earth is geologically active. Erosion, deposition, and plate tectonics have buried or destroyed most of Earth's craters.
Earth does have impact craters, but it has much few than the moon or Mercury and many of them are not readily visible. The main reason is that Earth has many active geologic processes that renew and change its surface, burying and destroying impact craters. If an impact crater on Earth is clearly visible then it probably formed quite recently in geologic history. Many of the impact craters on the moon and Mercury are billions of years old, dating to when the solar system was young and large asteroid impacts were far more common than they are now. Very little of Earth's crust from that time remains intact. By contrast craters on Earth that are tens of millions of years old are not readily visible.
Earth is geologically active with volcanoes, tectonic plates, and has a substantial atmosphere, moving water, and glaciers. These forces are constantly changing Earth's surface. Impact craters get eroded, buried, and outright erased. The moon has no significant geologic activity, no atmosphere, and no water. As a result craters on the moon can remain almost untouched for billions of years.
Craters
Impact craters on the moon have no water/weather to erode the craters away, but on Earth the erosion erases the craters over time.
Because there are not as many impact craters that you can see very well on Earth like there are on the Moon and Mercury.
The Earth has weather patterns that have eroded most of the craters on Earth. The moon has no weather, therefore no erosion.
On average the craters on Moon are larger than the Earth's because the Moon has no atmosphere to shield from impactors and no weathering processes.
No. Most of the impact craters that have formed on Earth have been destroyed and buried by geologic processes, processes that the moon lacks. While some recent impact craters on Earth remain visible on the surface, they are too small to be seen from the moon.
Earth is geologically active and has wind and water to erode craters. The moon is geologically dead and has no atmosphere and thus no erosion. There is nothing on the moon to destroy impact craters.
Those are impact craters from when it was hit by meteors. The moon has no weather, so they never got erased like most of the impact craters that were on Earth's surface.
Craters on the moon are not volcanic, they are impact craters.
Venus has about 1,000 young craters, the biggest of which is Crater Mead, about 170 mile across. Oddly, there is no evidence on Venus of old craters like we see on the moon, Earth, and Mars. Somehow these old craters were smoothed over on Venus . . . by lava flow?? By high winds??
No. Earth has far fewer craters. Most that once existed on Earth have been eroded, buried, or otherwise destroyed by geologic activity.
The Earth has had far more asteroid and meteorite impacts than the moon. Impact craters on Earth however are eroded by the atmosphere and water and also filled in by water and sediment. Since the moon has next to no atmosphere craters tend not to erode so they will always be visable.
The vast majority of lunar craters are caused by meteor impacts.