If one does the mathematics (which are *WAY* beyond the math level of even most scientists), one finds that string theory works only if one assumes the vibrations are aking place in eleven dimensions. Choose another assumption and the mathematics falls apart. Or, more exactly, the mathe eventually leads to falsehoods.
It is SOMETHING like this: if one assumes that there are ten dimensions in string theory, you end up with 1 = 0
Only if you assume that there are eleven dimensions does one get 1 = 1
That nothing is absolute.Science relies on induction - the idea that if something is true in all observed cases is must be true in all cases. For example - every time a plant cell has been observed under a microscope it has had a cell wall - therefore all plant cells have cell walls. Obviously it would be impossible to take samples of every single plant in the world - so this method is used.So when the word theory is used, it means that based on the current scientific evidence, this is the best explanation - or that something has been found in all observed cases - but the means to prove it absolutely do not exist.
The word world does not imply that that the world is round. Google Earth shows that the world is round lol but seriously everyone knows the world is round.
It implies common ancestry.
Carats imply weight; millimeters implies distance: they are not automatically related.
A biological process imply chemical and physical changes.
yes
We don't actually know how many dimensions there really are. Certain theoretical considerations imply that there are at least 10 or 11, it's just that most of them are "curled up small" and we don't notice them. That said, a 4D object cannot fully exist in a 3D space. However, a 3 dimensional "slice" of them can exist in that space, just like a 2D "slice" of a 3D object can exist in a 2D space.
that if one country fell to communism, the countries around it would fall too
No; it would imply an association with that product that does not exist.
the absence of a ul for a nutrient does not imply that it is safe to consume any amount, however. it means only that insuficent data exist to establish a value
Socialism/Communism imply the abolition of government and the establishment of a classless society where there is a true democracy.
Yes, the Alcubierre Drive relates to a solution to one of Einstein's field equations in his General Theory, although the solution itself does not imply that creation of the drive itself would be a practical endeavor; it remains in the realm of theory.
His demeanor seemed to imply the worst. I would not imply that.
The actual dimensions of the castle and associated town are never really given, which is not surprising since it is the stuff of legend rather than history. The stories just imply that it was a grand place.
The correct form is "does it imply", as "imply" is the base form of the verb and is used with the auxiliary verb "does" in interrogative sentences.
Implication is the noun form of "imply."
A: What does the look on his face imply?B: It implies that he doesn't like the plan.Just exactly what do you mean to imply by that?What ARE you trying to imply?Please imply elswhere.