0
Why does the majority party have an advantage over the minority party under under the committee system?
Any majority party will always have an advantage over a minority party. This is because there are more people in the majority party so their vote out weighs that of the minority party.
What else can I help you with?
What are the responsibility of the majority in the system of majority rules and rights?
There is no such thing given the context of the question. There are either rights, shared by minority and majority alike; or there is no rights but what the majority would grant to the minority - therefore they (the majority) have no responsibilities to the minority at all.
How does the majority party manage to control all the committees in its house and why does it do it?
The majority party controls the committee system in the House because the Speaker of the House, who is the leader of the majority party, is alloted a great deal of power and influence in the committee system. Specifically, she is in charge of appointing committee chairs. The committee chairs have a huge amount of control over what bills the committee will debate. The Speaker also is responsible for deciding what committee a certain bill will go to; thus the Speaker can assure that a bill from the majority party is swiftly passed.
Does democracy criticize the majority?
A properly functioning democracy IS the majority - the people - majority rule, minority rights.While there is always room for criticism, it should be constructive, not constant carping by the self-interested or the unrealistically idealistic or those seeking indirect power over the majority. Vocal minorities seek to overthrow democracy - the will of the majority - to implement their own minority agenda over the majority. Such a system of rule by the minority over the majority is Oligarchy, not Democracy.
Advantages and disadvantages of a systems review committee?
An advantage to having a system's review committee is their ability to catch problems that may affect the system. A disadvantage is the fact that the committee may tend to be too strict and delay production.
Why Belgium had a compulsory voting?
To have an higher democratic voting system. Without this system, a minority party that can push his voters to vote, an gain majority.
How does the Constitution protect minority rights over majority rule?
The Constitution protects minority rights through various mechanisms, such as the Bill of Rights, which guarantees individual liberties regardless of the majority's will. Additionally, the system of checks and balances, along with judicial review, ensures that laws and policies do not infringe upon the rights of minority groups. This framework helps to prevent the "tyranny of the majority" by allowing courts to strike down discriminatory laws and by requiring supermajority thresholds for certain decisions, thus safeguarding minority interests within a democratic system.
What has guided the selecting of committees chairpersons?
The majority party from each house selects the chairperson for each committee.The unwritten rule of the seniority system traditionally has guided the selection of chairpersons. The seniority system gave the member of the majority party with the longest uninterrupted service on a particular committee the leadership of that committee.
What system in which the decision of more than half the people is accepted by is called?
The system in which the decision of more than half the people is accepted is called a majority rule system.
When no one party has the majority in a multi-party system it must join with other parties to from a?
One of the two parties typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referred to as the majority party while the other is the minority party.
What does it mean for the majority to rule with respect to the minority?
In a system of majority rule, everyone agrees to abide by the decision of the majority. That is the foundation of the Democratic Process. As an example, the majority of Americans voted for President Obama, and he was voted into office. Some, the minority, did not vote for him, but, by the Democratic Process, embodied in the US Constitution, everyone implicitly agrees that he is the President of the United States. That does not mean that everyone agrees with him, but it does mean that they will support him in his role as President.
What is it that makes the rights of the minority most insecure according to Madison?
In Federalist Paper No. 10 James Madison wrote about how a republican government should be structured to protect the rights of the minority. He noted that the majority often has a tendency to abuse its powers leading to the "tyranny of the majority." Madison argued that this tyranny of the majority often leads to the minority having their rights infringed upon. He believed that in order for the rights of the minority to be secure the structure of the government should be so that it would protect these rights from the majority.Madison suggested three ways to protect the rights of the minority. First the government should be large enough that no one faction can become a majority and overpower the minority. Second the government should have a separation of powers so that each branch can act as a check on the other branches. Finally the government should have a system of representation so that the minority can have their views and interests represented in the government.These three aspects of a republican government are what Madison believed would protect the rights of the minority the most. By having a large government the majority cannot easily overpower the minority. By having a separation of powers each branch can act as a check on the other branches and preserve the rights of the minority. And by having a system of representation the minority can have their voices heard in the government. These three aspects according to Madison are what make the rights of the minority most secure.
Can a government based on majority vote protect the rights of those who are not part of the majority?
In Federalist Paper #10, James Madison argued that minority rights can be protected under a system of majority rule. Minority groups would be protected because the factions (political parties) would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called “politics,” namely, the art of governing.
