In Federalist Paper #10, James Madison argued that minority rights can be protected under a system of majority rule. Minority groups would be protected because the factions (political parties) would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called “politics,” namely, the art of governing.
people have equal rights People have natural rights
The rights and institutions based on Freedoms of speech,religion,press, and to involvement in the Government (Voting).
Yes, if your government is a democracy then this government will have been chosen (for a 4/5 year term) by the majority of people in your country in a free and fair election. It is therefore to be expected that this government will be doing what most of the people in your country want to be done. Therefore by definition the government will have your interests at heart. With other forms of government the situation is not so clear, but in general where government is not based on some form of majority consent, government tends to be self serving and looks to maintaining the interests of an elite rather than the general populace.
Your question is very confusing. The political parties were NOT what they are now. In fact, the Republican/Democrat idealism thing was completely reversed back during post Colonial times. Plus the fact that John Locke was English, not American. Plus he was an English philosipher, not a politition.
American government is based on the English political idea of three different types of governments mixed into one. Ordered government is government laws that are clearly stated with specific punishments if broken for the people, limited government has rules that are made by government but the people have clearly stated rights and representative government where the government is suppose to serve the will of the people and come up with laws together.
It wasn't the constitution that failed to protect rights, it's the fact that the government was never based on the constitution and didn't follow it.
The core idea of the Declaration was written by John Locke and it was that man had natural rights given by God and that men form governments to protect these rights. When a government no longer serves to protect the rights or protect man that they have the right to change the government. Jefferson, then lists, the charges against the King as to why he hasn't proected the rights given by God. The Vietnamese Declaration of Independence was based on the Declaration of Independence in the United States.
The Iranian constitution is adopted. This law is based on Islamic principles. According to this law are supported by the people.
To protect the rights of the majority as well as defending the rights of the minority. To defend the citizens against invasion, To educate its citizens. To allow ownership of personal property and to respect the inherent rights of ownership. To create a judicial system based upon fairness and established law.
The Bill of Rights, also known as the first ten amendments, states as clearly as possible what the government is not allowed to do to the individuals of its nation. The rights mentioned are mostly based on people being treated fairly if they were to be arrested.
Thomas Jefferson stated the government should be based on protecting the rights of people's freedom. The Declaration of Independence was based on the rights of people.
The core idea comes from John Locke and it is that man has been given natural rights by God and that governments are formed to protect these rights. When a government no longer protects the rights that man has the right to change the government.
In what style of government does the legislature elect the executive?
The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions reflect Jefferson's view on government because Jefferson wanted he government based on a strict translation of the Constitution. Jefferson's views included that government was instituted to protect individual's rights.
Thoreau believed that the majority rule can lead to the oppression of minority viewpoints and rights. He argued that true justice requires respect for individual conscience and rights, which may be sacrificed in a system where the majority dictates policies and decisions. Thoreau's concern was that such a system can easily lead to tyranny and injustice.
Yes, that statement is generally accurate. Democracy ensures that decisions are made by the majority while also protecting the rights and interests of minority groups. This balance is essential for upholding principles of equality and fairness in a democratic society.
people have equal rights People have natural rights