The mender of roads stares at the marquis's carriage because it represents the oppressive aristocracy that he resents. The carriage serves as a reminder of the inequality and injustices present in society, fueling the mender of roads' discontent.
Gabrielle, the mender of roads, told Ernest Defarge about the body found under the carriage of the Marquis.
The Marquis is annoyed with the Mender of Roads because the man saw someone hanging from a chain beneath the Marquis' carriage but couldn't give enough information.
Versailles
construction workers
The character who was also a mender of roads in "A Tale of Two Cities" is Jerry Cruncher. He works as a resurrection man, secretly digging up and selling corpses to medical schools, which adds a layer of intrigue to his character.
The blue cap worn by the mender of roads in "A Tale of Two Cities" symbolizes the French Revolution and the common people rising up against oppression and inequality. It signifies the revolutionary spirit and movement for change.
The wood sawyer who met Lucie near the prison in Charles Dickens' "A Tale of Two Cities" is Jerry Cruncher. He is a rough and unkempt man who works as a resurrection man at night and a porter by day. Jerry is married to a verbally abusive woman and is known for his quirky habit of "flopping" in his spare time.
If you are referring to Acadia National Park, it is 57 miles of road to be used by hikers, bikers, walkers, horse riders and horse-drawn carriages on the island. No automobiles are allowed within the roads. It is a peaceful setting with many scenic views.
The laws are the same but there are additional restrictions that apply to learners such as supervision, which roads they use, carriage of passengers etc.
Central Park in NYC is a sanctuary of green in the middle of Manhattan. It has miles of paths and roads, a zoo, a theater and horse-drawn carriage rides.
Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.Roman transportation was good for its time. Their roads made moving goods and travel for people efficient. However, it was slow and bumpy compared with today. They could only go at the speed of their horses and if traveling in a carriage or wagon, the ride was bumpy as there were no springs to cushion the carriage from the road. Travel by ship was smoother (if one was not prone to seasickness) but it too was slow compared with today as a ship's speed depended upon either the wind or rowers. Transportation in the city was either by litter or walking.
Because they are roads.