When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.
yesANS 2 - NO. biological warfare is a perversion of science and many scientists agree on that.
anthrax and botulin toxin
Opinions about biological warfare being a legitimate use of science will differ. It is my opinion that using science to hurt and destroy human beings, animals, the environment or anything at all is NEVER a legitimate use of science.
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
yes they spread small pox among the native people
Biological warfare.
John Cookson has written: 'A survey of chemical and biological warfare' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare 'Using Unix'
Biological Warfare
Three biological warfare agents that are toxins are: Ricin Botulism Staphylococcal Enterotoxin (SEB)
yesANS 2 - NO. biological warfare is a perversion of science and many scientists agree on that.
Biological Warfare
A bioagent is a biological agent - a bacterium which can be used as a weapon in biological warfare.
smallpox
smallpox
Germ warfare. Biological warfare. Bioagents.
No, it isn't
Bio warfare is living creatures; if a contaminated mosquito was delivered to the enemy that would be bio warfare. Chemical warfare is just what it says: chemicals.