Want this question answered?
Tidal energy is a form of gathering energy from the tidal currents. Depending of the size of the system it could cost billions. A system planned for Britain would cost 15 billion pounds to build.
Hydroelectric power plants generate very little electric current for the cost of building, using, and maintaining the equipment used to produce it.
Destruction of free-running rivers and their ecosystems
Hydroelectric energy reaches the user as electricity in the grid distribution system, the user can't tell where it comes from. So the question should just be how does electricity affect people, which is obvous I would think.
who give's
very
The cost is the difference of thousands of families without jobs
Depending on the size it could cost millions of dollars, millions of pounds, millions of euros. There's no way of answering this question accurately. One of the suggested tidal stations for the Severn Estuary in England/Wales is costed at 23 billion pounds. That depends on how wide an estuary it has to span, on the geological conditions for its foundations, on the tidal range, and other factors. But for any serious tidal barrage you are looking at hundreds of millions of pounds, probably billions of pounds. Basically what we are saying is that Tidal power is not developed as of yet. We do not know the cost per watt of this technology as of yet.
It may cos around 100 MWh
Destruction of free-running rivers and their ecosystems
Tidal energy is a form of gathering energy from the tidal currents. Depending of the size of the system it could cost billions. A system planned for Britain would cost 15 billion pounds to build.
Hydroelectric power plants generate very little electric current for the cost of building, using, and maintaining the equipment used to produce it.
Destruction of free-running rivers and their ecosystems
The major hurdle associated with hydro power is to ensure uniform availability of water which is not possible as water availability is gioverened by nature. The huge capital cost ( almost three to four times than thermal power) is another drawback yielda higher unit rate of production.
Yes, hydroelectric could power a city. The issue with most green energy sources is cost and inability to obtain uninterrupted power on demand. Hydroelectric does not have these limitations. It does have some negative environmental impacts, just as all energy sources do.
Hydroelectric energy reaches the user as electricity in the grid distribution system, the user can't tell where it comes from. So the question should just be how does electricity affect people, which is obvous I would think.
YES