They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
they want to make more money and do not care except for the bottom line.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
they want to make more money and do not care except for the bottom line.
Companies taking advantage of low labor costs don't make trouble for repressive governments.
Companies taking advantage of low labor costs don't make trouble for repressive governments.
Companies may prioritize profit over ethics, choosing to operate in countries with repressive governments to benefit from lower costs or access to resources. Some companies may also believe that engaging with these governments could lead to positive change. However, in doing so, they may inadvertently support or enable human rights abuses.
If a company objects to a repressive government, they might not be allowed to do business in that country anymore.
They pressurise governments and organisations and try to end human right abuses.
Governments worldwide - they would foal inequalities and abuses of power.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
They pressurise governments and organisations and try to end human right abuses.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
They tend to care more about a safe investment climate than about human rights.
Because Sand monkeys decide they are different