There are differences between using the words can, do, don't, prevent, prohibit, etc.
A person CAN testify him / her- self.
The State (the police; the prosecutor; the Judge; the Jury) CANNOT expect or force a person to testify against him / her- self.
It is called self-incrimination to testify against yourself. Testify here means "speak" (to police), not only speaking in court.
Many people talk too much. They incriminate themselves.
The 5th Amendment protects citizens from being FORCED to give testimony against themselves.
Many people do not know the 5th Amendment. They are ignorant of this law. Some people may be uneducated. The Amendment is designed to protect EVERYONE, whether uneducated or very smart.
However, the 5th Amendment does not mean YOU CANNOT testify against yourself. It is unwise to do, but you CAN if you WANT. You should ask your attorney FIRST.
Reasons a person might decide to "give testimony" despite the 5th Amendment:
People DO get themselves in trouble by talking!
Because some people are uneducated and because many people do not know all the laws, and because State laws differ, lawyers prefer people do not talk (testify) until they consult an attorney. Self-incrimination has no "out". You did what you said you did, even if you did not say it perfectly well the first time, or even if you should have explained better what you meant.
NO amendment says a person has the right to testify against himself (which is true), but there is one that says the opposite.The Fifth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, says that no citizen can be forced to testify against themselvesi.e. you have the right to NOT testify against yourself.In popular culture, "taking the Fifth" means "invoking your right against self-incrimination."
Crime committed against "the state." Individuals (who are victims or complainants) appear in court to testify as to the facts of the crimes committed against them, but the the crime is prosecuted as if it were a crime against all citizens of the state.
Frederic B. Crossley has written: 'Courts and lawyers of Illinois' -- subject(s): Courts, Judges, Lawyers
The courts and lawyers. Court reporters sell the transcripts of the trial to the lawyers involved in the cases.
Lawyers do not have the ability to garnish wages. That is the jurisdiction of the courts. A lawyer can petition the court for a garnishment for their fees.
The courts and the officers of the courts (lawyers, clerks, judges, and so forth) are all members of the judicial branch of government.
The circumstances under which one would have to testify in court will vary according to the jurisdiction. In the English courts a witness needs to be cross examined, so that if their testimony is key to the case, they can be subpoenaed. This compels them to attend court and testify.
In Pakistan,its Pakistan bar council of supreme court,Punjab bar council of the high courts and district courts of Punjab.
Yes, in general the courts can force you to testify with some exceptions. You have the right to refuse to testify if your testimony would tend to incriminate you. In addition the laws and Rules of Evidence provide certain people privileges from being forced to testify as to certain matters, such as for example, the attorney-client and priest-penitent privilege.
Rudolph Joseph Gerber has written: 'Lawyers, courts, and professionalism' -- subject(s): Administration of Justice, Courts, Justice, Administration of, Lawyers 'The insanity defense' -- subject(s): Jurisprudence, Insanity, Criminal liability, Criminal intent
The justice system: courts, judges, lawyers, law enforcement officers
Probably not, if you live anywhere with sensible courts. What harm has occurred as a result of the overdose? Who administered the drug? Dosages are usually stated plainly on packaging or on the accompanying literature. However, in some countries lawyers will take a case against anyone, on the silliest grounds.