A scientific theory is something that is expiremented/tested. Not all hypotheses will become theories because sometimes they aren't facts,they are educated guesses.
A scientific theory is something that is tried and tested, and not yet disproven. It is close to being scientific 'fact' as you can get. Not all hypotheses will become theories because sometimes they get disproven. That means the hypothesis will need to be changed and tested again.
all theories don't become laws
Hypotheses are ideas which are, as yet, unsupported by evidence. As a hypothesis becomes backed up by mathematical formulae and observational data, it may, if it is sound, become a theory. All scientific theories began life as hypotheses, it is merely a case of which hypotheses become theories, and which fall down by the wayside after being discredited or having lacked support.
All are testable and falsifiable, and all have evidence to back them up. Without evidence, it is a hypothesis.
all theories don't become laws
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
Theories are ideas accepted as most likely true. Theories are basically hypotheses which have been tested many times by many people and are found to be true.
There are various scientific theories explaining the creation of the Earth, with the most widely accepted being the nebular hypothesis. This theory suggests that the solar system formed from a massive cloud of gas and dust about 4.6 billion years ago. Other theories include the giant impact hypothesis, proposing that the Moon was formed from debris after a collision with a Mars-sized body, and the gravitational instability hypothesis, suggesting that the Earth formed directly from the collapse of a molecular cloud.
It's quite possible to use all sort of data to become true a hypothesis. The problem is to find the correct type of data.
All theories don't become laws because of several reasons, most notably the notion that anybody can come up with a theory before having sufficient proof to back it up.Remember that one of the first few steps of the scientific method is to formulate a hypothesis. Regardless of the hypothesis' correctness, it is still a theory which may or may not become true. Rigorous testing and examination must prove it to be true. Many theories in science especially conflict with one another, but the laws are universal to my understanding.For example, the law of universal gravitation is accepted everywhere because it has been tested quiet a bit (without which we would not have entered space). However, many theories such as those that examine how the earth was created are still subject to intense speculation--was it the Big Bang, God, evil robotic aliens?So there you have it.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
A hypothesis is used to make predictions. Experiments are carried out to test these predictions. If the outcome of the experiment was not as predicted then the hypothesis is falsified. It is either rejected or modified. If the outcome of the experiment confirms the prediction then that provides some evidence that the hypothesis is true.Over time, after testing different predictions, there will be a significant amount of evidence in favour of the hypothesis, and all the main alternatives have been rejected. At that stage the hypothesis becomes a theory.