Because the US already has a big debt to pay and cannot afford another war/"intervention"
The US should have definitely got involved in the genocide because there were mass murders and they could have done something.
i think it did...
Please specify which two wars you are talking about.
Ever since they labeled it as a genocide they have been saying they are going to help yet so far verry little has been done to help the citizens in darfur
which genocide?
Akec Khoc Aciew Khoc is the Ambassador to the US for South Sudan.
In 1776 there was no US and Washington was commander of the army so he was involved. I think you have gotten him confused with someone else or the war.
Laos was neutral. Nationalist China (Taiwan) was an ally but did NOT send men to Vietnam. If Taiwan had gotten involved in Vietnam, Red China might have gotten involved too. Red China and Nationalist China were bitter enemies in the 1960's.
mass-murder
NOTING
Sudan is an example of Genocide in 21st Century. It happened after almost 6 decades after 2nd world war and Holoucast of the Jews by Nazi Germany.When after world war II, leaders all over the world are doing so much for peace, try to avoid war, ethnic conflicts. Now a genocide occured in Darfur. African brother killing African. Muslims killing Muslim. And a state President (Umr al Bashir) sponsors it with Janjaweed Militants. As a result many were killed (95% peaceful, innocent people), million displaced (flew to Chad, basically). And we just watch. UN didn;t recognise the killing as Genocide. US people did a lot, but not the Government. But in the EYES of the CONCIOUS PEOPLE all over the world. Its a killing, a massacre, its a Genocide.
3000