Want this question answered?
Machine level instructions can be converted to readable assembly language using a disassembler. If the machine instructions originated from a higher level language, there may also be a decompiler to create something resembling the original high level language version of the program.
A program that translates source code into object code. The compiler derives its name from the way it works, looking at the entire piece of source code and collecting and reorganizing the instructions. Thus, a compiler differs from an interpreter, which analyzes and executes each line of source code in succession, without looking at the entire program. The advantage of interpreters is that they can execute a program immediately. Compilers require some time before an executable program emerges. However, programs produced by compilers run much faster than the same programs executed by an interpreter.Every high-level programming language (except strictly interpretive languages) comes with a compiler. In effect, the compiler is the language, because it defines which instructions are acceptable.Because compilers translate source code into object code, which is unique for each type of computer, many compilers are available for the same language. For example, there is a FORTRAN compiler for PCs and another for Apple Macintosh computers. In addition, the compiler industry is quite competitive, so there are actually many compilers for each language on each type of computer. More than a dozen companies develop and sell C compilers for the PC.
C-compiler translates the C-source into Assembly or machine code. On the other hand, C-interpreter -- well, there is no such thing as C-interpreter.
No
softwere
Compilers and interpreters.
various components of system programming are: - Assemblers - Interpreters - Compilers - Loaders - Macros
complisr check entrie program at a time and gives errors and wrranings. but interpreters chech line by line. if any line having error it gives message . if u cleary error in that and goes to next line. otherwise checking in that line only. in java language use both compilers and interpreters
during testing of any code it is usefull, normally interpreters are slow as we need to interpret every time the code is to be executed , but for compilers object code generated can used for any no . of times . for a code to be interpreted it has to be completely in main memory .
It's a part of program ignored by compilers and/or interpreters, created mainly for source code documentation.
High-level languages are converted into machine code using translation software, which is commonly included with programming software. Compilers and interpreters are the terms for these translators. Compilers and interpreters are used to translate programmes. To learn more about data science please visit- Learnbay.co
compiler and interpreter used to convert high level language to machine level language .....compiler does dis job in atonce while interpreter does in step by step
Always the same: text-editors, compilers, linkage-editors, debuggers... well interpreters too. These are often integrated into so called IDEs (Integrated Developing Environment).
Neither one will be categorically "better" than the other. In general, compilers produce more efficient programs, while interpreters produce more reusable code (platform independence).
Machine level instructions can be converted to readable assembly language using a disassembler. If the machine instructions originated from a higher level language, there may also be a decompiler to create something resembling the original high level language version of the program.
There is no simple answer to this question. Some compilers compile fast, others compile slow, and generate highly efficient or inefficient code. The same applies to scripting languages (which would better be classified interpreted languages or interpreters to contrast compiled languages or compilers).In today's languages and tools, the distinction between compiler and interpreter blurs. Most interpreters including compilation steps, for example to generate pre-compiled code and/or just-in-time compilation (e.g. Java and .NET languages). Other intermediate technologies exist.
Assemblers convert Assembly code to machine code Interpreters convert high level code to real-time machine code and store it in the memory for direct execution Compilers convert high level code to real-time machine code or some intermediate code and store it in a file for later execution Assemblers use the basic building blocks of the command processor code to write programs and is the language closest to the binary on which all computers operate, although it is difficult to use it does work well for things like networking and communication protocols. Interpreters are just what they say, they translate the code in real time as you operate the program, then process it, and are therefore the slowest. Compilers translate the code into a format the computer understands prior to the execution (or distribution) of the code and is therefore the easiest to use as it combines the better attributes of both programming methods into one easy to use package.