0
Why isPlanning is a thinking processand managers being men of action should have no use for itcomment?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
What is planning?
Planning is thinking of ways to accomplish an activity consider the resources available to the family. :)
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Planning is the thinking process and managers being a men of action should have no use for it comment?
Being of no use to the managers is one of the limitations of the planning process. The space among where the firm is and where they aspire to go may be closed with the help of planning. Making decisions regarding the future in the present is planning. It refers to what must be done, how it must be done when it must be done, and by whom. Managers frequently avoid planning because it is seen of as a significant, time-consuming, expensive, and laborious mental exercise. It requires careful consideration, a tonne of paperwork, and a lot of time. The majority of managers do not enjoy engaging in such challenging and difficult mental efforts that may or may not result in outcomes. Managers typically favour action over contemplation. As men of action, managers shouldn't employ planning since it involves thinking.
The most effective managers of the future will?
The effective manager of the future will be creative, deal well with people in all aspects of the organization, and always thinking ahead. These effective managers keep the line of communication open to and from employees as they anticipate problems. They are on the constant look-out for opportunities to further the organization's goal.
Where can one learn about team management?
Many websites provide information on team management. Wikipedia, Mind Tools, and Thinking Managers all offer articles on the subject. For more formal instruction, see books on team management, like "Team Management: Achieving Business Results Through Teams."
Managers who initiate major changes in their organizations are often high in?
(1) High in those organisations; (2) High in innovation and strategic thinking; (3) High in influence; (4) High in determination and respected for getting the job done; (5) High in experience and know how to develop Business Cases in order to get the support of the rest of the Business in order to initiate the changes.
How can managers develop competencies in order to overcome the challenges facing them now and in the future?
In my experience, most Managers do not fully recognize the potential each member of their team brings to the table (or they tend to ignore it in some cases). For example, a DBA friend has substantial developing background in the Oracle Financials arena, but company 'politics' prevent him from completing a multitude of tasks they are paying an outside consultant to do. Government thinking, "I can eat up our excess IT budget with this contractor so that I can get a bigger one next year for what I really want." Weigh your staff's real talents and you will capitalize on all spectrums. A successful Manager knows this.
Planning is the thinking process and managers being a men of action should have no use for it comment?
Being of no use to the managers is one of the limitations of the planning process. The space among where the firm is and where they aspire to go may be closed with the help of planning. Making decisions regarding the future in the present is planning. It refers to what must be done, how it must be done when it must be done, and by whom. Managers frequently avoid planning because it is seen of as a significant, time-consuming, expensive, and laborious mental exercise. It requires careful consideration, a tonne of paperwork, and a lot of time. The majority of managers do not enjoy engaging in such challenging and difficult mental efforts that may or may not result in outcomes. Managers typically favour action over contemplation. As men of action, managers shouldn't employ planning since it involves thinking.
How does a private led company affect strategy implementation?
There is rarely time for reflection and long range thinking in the daily events of the owner. Managers seems to be reluctant to share the planing strategies with others and those plans exist only in thinking stage
What are some advantages of a discussion with colleagues and managers?
Discussion with colleagues and managers allows you to exchange ideas with them, work out issues together, understand their positions, etc. Discussions about specific projects allow everyone to know what the others are thinking and all can contribute their ideas in order to work as a team on the project.
The most effective managers of the future will?
The effective manager of the future will be creative, deal well with people in all aspects of the organization, and always thinking ahead. These effective managers keep the line of communication open to and from employees as they anticipate problems. They are on the constant look-out for opportunities to further the organization's goal.
who is the middle manager of Google?
Middle managers are also subject to turf wars, and rarely a prime focus, for their companies. Google's founders originally had a certain disdain for middle managers, thinking that bosses were mostly unnecesary. But, as they have created, one of the most data-rich and sophisticated HR departments, in the world, they've found out that middle managers are incredibly important, according to a piece by Farhad Manjoo at Slate.
Describe your personal qualities that suit the requirements of production supervisors?
Store managers must have strong leadership abilities. And, they must be able to effectively communicate with others. Store managers must be level-headed and good listeners.
Where can you buy sport peppers in dallas area?
I'm thinking that you just can't. I went to three stores last evening (Whole Foods, Kroger, and Tom Thumb - nada, and what's more none of the managers ever heard of them).
Does the Krebs cycle produce glucose?
im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking im thinking
What has the author Alan Waring written?
Alan Waring has written: 'Systems methods for managers' -- subject- s -: System analysis, Problem solving, System theory 'Practical systems thinking' -- subject- s -: Management, Problem solving, Systems analysis
Why do managing directors get paid more than a cleaner in the same company?
This has to do basically with demand and supply. In the labour market the price that correspond to demand and supply of labour is wage, because (1)it takes time for one to become a good manager, (2)managers are in short supply hence, the price (wage) paid them are higher than that of a cleaner. (3) Also,the demand for good managers are higher than cleaners hence, higher wage is paid managers (4)Again, Managers are able to negotiate for better remuneration , (5)Managers have higher level of eduction than cleaners therefore are paid more (6)Even though Cleaners work very hard they use physical strength, but the manager uses his brain which involves more thinking that can not be quantify easily, hence they are paid something higher to compensate for using the brain. (7) Managers have other special skills like computer skills cleaners may not have (8) A Manager will always be paid more than the a cleaner because managers manages cleaners.
What has the author David K Hildebrand written?
David K. Hildebrand has written: 'Prediction analysis of cross classifications' -- subject(s): Prediction theory 'Statistical thinking for managers' -- subject(s): Statistical methods, Industrial management, Data processing, Statistics, Economics
What is individual thinking in critical thinking?
individual thinking means thinking on your own
