The issue of long-term effects of the Chernobyl disaster on civilians is very controversial because when the disaster happened they had to be evacuated. The area don't present dangers but getting back or living there with no job.
much of the rest if India is not well suited for human habitation.
Sarum is the oldest human settlement in Salisbury, England. Evidence of human habitation has been found dating back to as early as 3000 BC.
There is evidence of human habitation in Australia for the last 40,000 years. Probably, Aborigines have inhabited Australia for around 50,000 years.
The wholesale slaughter of human beings is a war crime .
Today, the background radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the same as the average amount of natural radiation present anywhere on Earth. It is not enough to affect human health. http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/kids/KPSH_E/question_box/question12.html
Human habitation of the Americas began approximately 30,000 years ago
It is a very cold and dry landscape and is not suitable for long-term human habitation. Ninety-eight percent of the continent is covered with an ice sheet.
People lived in caves in the past for various reasons. Caves provided natural shelter from the elements, protection from predators, and were readily available in many environments. They also offered privacy and security for early human populations. Additionally, caves had a relatively constant temperature, which made them suitable for human habitation.
bad for birds and that
Conditions in Africa were suitable for human habitation due to the varied geography, abundant natural resources, and favorable climate for agriculture. The presence of rivers like the Nile provided water for irrigation and transport, while the diverse ecosystems offered a range of food sources. Additionally, the temperate climate in many regions allowed for year-round habitation and the development of complex societies.
Human stupidity
Human existence, Human Habitation, Human Needs (food, water etc.) and Human ignorance
Clovis Spear points
Yes
Because the environmental conditions are not conducive to human habitation.
Farming, logging, mining and land development for human habitation are the usual suspects.
If by "least inhabited" you mean human habitation, it must be Antarctica.