In order to discuss incompatibility, you need to have two distinct things. Democracy is incompatible with other forms of political theory, such as abolutism, military rule, or theocracy, but it is compatible with most everything else, such as different economic systems, social organizations, religions, etc.
No empire established democracy. The first instance of democracy was in the city-state of ancient Athens, which was a republic. Since democracy means rule by the people, the terms democracy and empire are a dichotomy.
Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire
Israel doesn't have an empire. It is a parliamentary Republic with representational democracy.
The Roman Empire was not a democracy, there were no votes and no voted elected officials. It was however designed as a Republic which had appointed representation, Senators.
No. Sharia Law is incompatible with Democracy as practiced in the majority of non-Islamic nations in that its doctrine leaves no no room forr an independent Judicial Branch.
?
No. The Aztec Empire was a monarchy.
the Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy
The Mayan Empire was not a democracy. Do not assume that there were ANY rights as you now know rights.
Democracy in the Greek world was short lived - Alexander himself was running an empire with no democracy, and his successors set themselves up as kings. No room for democracy there.
Democracy in the Greek world was short lived - Alexander himself was running an empire with no democracy, and his successors set themselves up as kings. No room for democracy there.