yes he was
fat,lazy,greedy for money, but was a good leader
i have no idea!! i think he was a bad leader coz all he cared about was the money he had got from royalty
George Washington was a good leader and he was cautious.
He was a great leader.
yes a very good king
well he was a good leader but he was mean to the poor people and would not help them adjectives he was mean bad leader wise.
no he was mean
he was the biggest idiot
He didn't want to lose the valuable good trade from the colonies:)
William was a good king because he was well prepared and was a good leader.
No, he really wan't a tyrant. Many Americans consider him one, but he was never a tyrant. Americans went from a good king to ask a a real Tyrant King (France) for help.
The reason why King George was on this war because he needed to win the battle and he needed the money. The colonists did not need the money because they already have good weapons and stuff like that that's why the British really needed this war.