0
Why is Philosophy is based on human reason alone but still a reliable body of knowledge?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Because humans only understand their own reasoning. As for it being a reliable body of knowledge all depends on what philosophical school you belong too.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Philosophy relies on human reason because it seeks to provide explanations and insights about the fundamental nature of existence, knowledge, and values. While it is based on human reasoning, it builds upon centuries of rigorous analysis, logical argumentation, and critical thinking. Through this process, philosophy has developed robust methodologies that allow for the examination of ideas and principles, making it a reliable source of knowledge.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What best describes rationalism?
Rationalism is a philosophy that emphasizes the role of reason in acquiring knowledge and understanding the world. It asserts that reason and logic are the primary sources of knowledge, as opposed to relying on sensory experience or intuition. Rationalists believe that certain truths can be known through reason alone, independent of empirical evidence.
What does a posteriori mean in philosophy?
In philosophy, a posteriori refers to knowledge that is gained through experience or observation. This type of knowledge is empirical, based on evidence gathered from the external world rather than through pure reason alone. A posteriori knowledge is contrasted with a priori knowledge, which is derived from reason and does not require empirical evidence.
First philosopher to systematically attack the belief that reason alone could provide knowledge?
David Hume is widely regarded as the first philosopher to systematically attack the belief that reason alone could provide knowledge. Hume's skepticism and empiricism challenged the traditional view that reason could lead to certain knowledge, suggesting instead that knowledge is based on experience and perception.
Did men of the Age of Reason see the order of the world in science or religion?
Men of the Age of Reason tended to see the order of the world more through the lens of science rather than religion. They valued reason, rationality, and empirical evidence over religious doctrine in their quest to understand the natural world. This led to advancements in fields such as physics, astronomy, and biology that challenged traditional religious beliefs.
What is the real definition of philosophy?
Philosophy is the study of fundamental questions regarding existence, knowledge, value, reason, mind, and language. It seeks to understand and clarify concepts, critically evaluate arguments, and explore the nature of reality and human experience.
What does a posteriori mean in philosophy?
In philosophy, a posteriori refers to knowledge that is gained through experience or observation. This type of knowledge is empirical, based on evidence gathered from the external world rather than through pure reason alone. A posteriori knowledge is contrasted with a priori knowledge, which is derived from reason and does not require empirical evidence.
Did men of the Age of Reason see the order of the world in science or religion?
Men of the Age of Reason tended to see the order of the world more through the lens of science rather than religion. They valued reason, rationality, and empirical evidence over religious doctrine in their quest to understand the natural world. This led to advancements in fields such as physics, astronomy, and biology that challenged traditional religious beliefs.
First philosopher to systematically attack the belief that reason alone could provide knowledge?
David Hume is widely regarded as the first philosopher to systematically attack the belief that reason alone could provide knowledge. Hume's skepticism and empiricism challenged the traditional view that reason could lead to certain knowledge, suggesting instead that knowledge is based on experience and perception.
Is online investment information always reliable?
No. You can hardly trust anyone, let alone class such important infortmation as reliable. Let alone from the internet, on which any idiot can have their input (ironic that I am offering such a reliable response ;) )
What is the real definition of philosophy?
Philosophy is the study of fundamental questions regarding existence, knowledge, value, reason, mind, and language. It seeks to understand and clarify concepts, critically evaluate arguments, and explore the nature of reality and human experience.
What is Knowledge Alone in Latin?
Sapientia sola.
What beliefs were central to martin luther's religious philosophy?
salvation by faith alone
Why is something considered reliable if there's a date?
It depends on what type of document you are referring to. "Something" with a date is not considered "reliable" on that count alone but a date can add credence depending on the issue.It depends on what type of document you are referring to. "Something" with a date is not considered "reliable" on that count alone but a date can add credence depending on the issue.It depends on what type of document you are referring to. "Something" with a date is not considered "reliable" on that count alone but a date can add credence depending on the issue.It depends on what type of document you are referring to. "Something" with a date is not considered "reliable" on that count alone but a date can add credence depending on the issue.
Please explain your philosophy?
90% of human intelligence is leaving others the hell alone!
What is Immanuel Kant reaction on pure reason?
Immanuel Kant believed that pure reason is limited in its ability to understand and know the world, as it is bound by the constraints of human cognition. He argued that pure reason alone cannot access fundamental truths about reality, and that a combination of reason and empirical observation is necessary for true understanding. This led Kant to develop his theory of transcendentally ideal knowledge, where knowledge is structured by the mind rather than being a direct representation of the world.
What is the meaning of poetic reason?
Poetic reason was a subject of great debate in ancient philosophy, less so today. Many ancients believed the only way to true knowledge or any furthering of existing knowledge could only be done by means of logical, formulaic, syllogistic reasoning. I believe it was Aristotle who suggested that "thinking outside the box" or poetic reasoning could be as or more effective in some situations. I believe most who valued poetic reasoning believed that the combination of creativity and emotions helped the mind to see farther than logic alone could. Hope this helps!
Who believed reason could not explain metaphysics?
The philosopher Immanuel Kant believed that reason alone could not explain metaphysics. He argued that there are aspects of reality that transcend human understanding and are beyond the limits of reason. Kant proposed that metaphysical concepts such as God, free will, and immortality are beyond the scope of rational knowledge.
