It is from a Norman perspective ( which means it is biased)
seamstresses were not at the battle and were told what happened (the info passed on could be false)
-----------
That is an extremely uninsightful, and incorrect, answer.
The Bayeaux tapestry is immensely useful to historians. First and most important, it shows us the Norman perspective of the battle, which has historical value in it sown right. Second, it contains subtle commentary by the embroiderers (who many historians believe were Saxon) in a series of tiny figures worked into the borders of the tapestry, ranging from mythological to satirical. They give us insight into the mindset of the people working on the piece. Lastly, the manner in which the tapestry has been interpreted down through the centuries offers insight into the values and historical perspective of each time period involved. There have been whole books written about that one aspect of the work.
To say that the piece has "no historical value" because the events it depicts may reflect the writer's (embroiderer's) cultural perspective is extremely simplistic, and presupposes that the historical record is normally accurate and pure. Josephus did not personally witness every event he recorded in ancient Rome, yet we consider his writings an important part of the historical record. even though we recognize his cultural bias. While the Bayeaux Tapestry is not a primary source, it is a valuable secondary source that offers historians a wealth of information on the world the Conquest took place in, as well as the event itself.
The Bayuex Tapestry told historians how weapons were handeled at this time. Such as the over hand use of the lance (not commonly) and the size and shape of the sheilds.
A tapestry could be used as a primary source. The fabric used and the theme can tell historians a lot, but not the entire story. Example is the Unicorn Tapestries are among the most beautiful and complex works of art from the late Middle Ages. There is a lot of symbolism in the work and yet historians have to guess at meanings and who made it. To understand sources historians have to understand what happened in history the Bayeux tapestry does exactly that .
Historians mostly or people interested in the Battle of Hastings and its before and afetr effects.
The battle of Hastings is portrayed on the Bayeux Tapestry
the historians use graphs to something that happened over . unicorns are fluffy.
because some of the information was false
The Bayuex Tapestry told historians how weapons were handeled at this time. Such as the over hand use of the lance (not commonly) and the size and shape of the sheilds.
pictures are useful to historians because it helps them picture what it was like in the past
A tapestry could be used as a primary source. The fabric used and the theme can tell historians a lot, but not the entire story. Example is the Unicorn Tapestries are among the most beautiful and complex works of art from the late Middle Ages. There is a lot of symbolism in the work and yet historians have to guess at meanings and who made it. To understand sources historians have to understand what happened in history the Bayeux tapestry does exactly that .
The population of Roche-à-Bateaux is 13,336.
Déchargement de bateaux was created in 1896.
yes
Historians mostly or people interested in the Battle of Hastings and its before and afetr effects.
The battle of Hastings is portrayed on the Bayeux Tapestry
the historians use graphs to something that happened over . unicorns are fluffy.
to describe their research
Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.