A controlled experiment is better than a none controlled experiment because you can control one of them and the other you can't. Science is a really fun subject.
i did an experiment on it. the answer is non-frozen.
A non-curable disease is just that. There are diseases that can be cured. Then, there are diseases that can be treated or controlled, but nothing better.
Those medications are Non-controlled ones. I would say, Better you get the suggestion from your Doctor. Because none other than Doctor would know well about the medications. If the Doctor says okay, buy your Non-controlled medication at http://www.MEDonWeb.net
yes..... renewable is better than non-renewable because you can renew it and it is better for the environment. :)
Organic food is better than non-organic because it contains more nutrients.
of course!
Because non smoker's have WAYYY better health then a smoker in racing.
A non-example of a control variable is a variable that is not intentionally kept constant or manipulated in an experiment. For example, in a study examining the effects of different teaching methods on student performance, the color of the walls in the classroom would be a non-example of a control variable because it is not being controlled or manipulated by the researcher. Non-examples of control variables can introduce confounding factors that may impact the results of an experiment.
Licensed massage therapists are better than non-licensed because they are legally trained. They are much more qualified and have better understand of what massage is.
No, an oven being stainless steel does not make it work better than a non stainless steel version.
Non traditional marketing is faster and efficient than traditional marketing.
Very Much Better.