A forest fire is not always started by us, (Although, that is the case for many. ) Like during a dry period of time, and just sheer exposure to the heat can catch something on fire. Since fire's like these are natural, people do not react as badly as a human started fire. BUT all fires are dangerous, and people just want to control it. NOW, when the fire goes out, there is a large amount of ash, dead animals, tree remains. Don't take this as a bad thing! After a few weeks, seeds that lay dormant just below the surface spring up at the large amount of nutrients and feast on it. Allowing the plants to grow big, and fast.
they are killing most of your trees and that takes away our air so if the forest fire keeps going we are not goin to have trees or plants to give us air so we die.
yes as it is often used as a bridge to prevent major fires from spreading althought any kind of fire near trees is a general bad idea
The largest forest fires in the world's _recorded_ history would be the 1997-98 Indonesian forest fires. though the fires after the hypothesised meteorite falling in the Mexico gulf probably released enough energy to start volcanoes and forest fires throughout all the continents. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1997_Indonesian_forest_fires the Indonesian fire burned on and off for 2 years. the biggest single fire was in Queensland, Australia. started on the 1/11/74 and burned throughout the Thargomindah, Bulloo Shire, Boulia Urandangie, McKinlay Shire. it burnt around 7,300,000ha.
Forest Fires are known to be good things because they are known to kill dead plants so they really "clean" up the forest
Forest fires have numerous benefits for plants and animals because they increase diversity. In the process of forest succession, in which bare rock may be converted into mature forests over a long time, certain plants and animals are better adapted to exploiting certain circumstances along that continuum. In fact, there are certain plants and animals that require fires to survive and reproduce. A mature forest requires plants to be shade tolerant, and food is actually quite scarce for most animals. An early successional forest benefits plants that require more sunlight to survive, and promotes the growth of plants that grow and spread quickly. As the forest regrows, its character changes and different plants and animals come and go to exploit the situation that suits them best. Without fires, if everything tended toward mature forest, many plants and animals would have a more difficult time surviving. There is also a complicated web of nutrients that are recycled by way of a forest fire.
Because it destroys them.
they are killing most of your trees and that takes away our air so if the forest fire keeps going we are not goin to have trees or plants to give us air so we die.
A bad thing is the forest wiped out or pollution.
Most oak trees to but its rare that they do not survive but sometimes it depends on how bad the fire is.
Out of the fat and into the fire. Alternatively, out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Yes, the elk's did get hurt by the Yellowstone fire . They had a bad thing with trying to esacpe.
Fire is not bad for people, only people that have a strange infatuation with fire, such as pyros. Obviously there are safety procedures one uses while working with fire. Never leave a fire untended, always put a fire out before leaving and other things such as that. But that all depends on what exactly your referring to when asking, "Why is fire bad for people?"
come on, what do you think. BAD, of course
No, because being evil is always a bad thing.
No, because being evil is always a bad thing.
It makes no difference if its a good thing or a bad thing - it is part of the legal process.
Usually forest fires are started by lightening stricking barks of a trees or tree. OR bits of rubbish on the ground, like glass, catches the suns light and makes a spark, and the trees in the forest fuel the fire. Or ARSON <- BAD