answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A letter is considered a more intimate form of making an argument because it allows for a personal touch and connection with the recipient. It gives the sender time to carefully craft their thoughts and arguments, often resulting in a more thoughtful and persuasive message compared to oral communication. Additionally, receiving a physical letter can be a tactile and memorable experience that can make a deeper impact on the recipient.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is a letter considered a more inmate for of making an argument?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a letter considered a more intimate form of making an argument?

Because it is written by one person and directed at another person instead of a general audience.


Why is a letter considered a more intimate form of making an argument apex?

A letter is considered more intimate because it allows for personal expression and a more nuanced presentation of thoughts and emotions. It provides a private and thoughtful space for the writer to craft an argument, as opposed to a more immediate and public form of communication like speaking. Additionally, the physical act of writing a letter can convey a sense of effort and care that is often appreciated by the recipient.


How does a counterclaim add to your argument?

A counterclaim strengthens your argument by acknowledging and addressing potential opposing viewpoints. It demonstrates that you have considered different perspectives and can effectively refute them, making your own argument more persuasive and comprehensive.


What is 'ad hominum'?

Ad hominem is a Latin term meaning "to the person." It is a type of logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the points they are making. This type of argument is considered invalid as it does not directly address the issue at hand.


What is the definition of an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It involves criticizing the characteristics or circumstances of the individual making the argument rather than the content of the argument itself. This type of fallacy is considered a weak form of argumentation because it does not address the actual logic or evidence presented in the argument.


What is an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.


What of these might be considered points of argument regarding making changes to the Western literary canon?

New voices vs. tradition Artistic merit vs. popularity


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument attacks the person rather than the reasoning?

This is referred to as an ad hominem attack (Latin to the man), attempting to invalidate the argument by making charges against the person making the argument.


Is greek vs roman considered points of argument regarding making changes to the western literary canon?

Tradition vs. diversity,Popularity vs. aesthetic value


Which of these might be considered points of argument reguarding making changes to the western literay canon?

white male vs. female minority artistic merit vs. sales


Why would you include a counterclaim in your argumentative research essay?

Including a counterclaim in an argumentative research essay strengthens your argument by acknowledging and refuting opposing viewpoints. It shows that you have considered a variety of perspectives and have a strong understanding of the topic, making your argument more persuasive and credible.


What is a hominem?

A hominem is a Latin term that translates to "against the person." It is often used in the context of logical fallacies, specifically ad hominem attacks, where an argument is directed against a person's character or traits instead of focusing on the actual argument they are making. This type of fallacy is considered weak because it does not address the substance of the argument itself.