A letter is considered a more intimate form of making an argument because it allows for a personal touch and connection with the recipient. It gives the sender time to carefully craft their thoughts and arguments, often resulting in a more thoughtful and persuasive message compared to oral communication. Additionally, receiving a physical letter can be a tactile and memorable experience that can make a deeper impact on the recipient.
"Amend to add" typically refers to making changes or corrections to existing legal documents in order to include additional information. In the context of an inmate, it could mean updating their case file or legal paperwork with new details or evidence.
She considered all the options before making a decision.
"I rest my case" is used to indicate that one has presented all the evidence or arguments they feel are necessary to prove their point, and that they believe their case is now closed. It is often used to suggest that the matter has been sufficiently demonstrated and there is no need for further discussion or argument.
In Toronto, Canada, you are legally considered an adult at the age of 18. At this age, you gain the rights and responsibilities associated with adulthood, such as voting, signing contracts, and making your own medical decisions.
Yes, grabbing someone's butt without their consent is considered groping and is a form of sexual harassment. It is important to always seek permission and respect boundaries when engaging in physical intimacy.
Because it is written by one person and directed at another person instead of a general audience.
A letter is considered more intimate because it allows for personal expression and a more nuanced presentation of thoughts and emotions. It provides a private and thoughtful space for the writer to craft an argument, as opposed to a more immediate and public form of communication like speaking. Additionally, the physical act of writing a letter can convey a sense of effort and care that is often appreciated by the recipient.
A counterclaim strengthens your argument by acknowledging and addressing potential opposing viewpoints. It demonstrates that you have considered different perspectives and can effectively refute them, making your own argument more persuasive and comprehensive.
Ad hominem is a Latin term meaning "to the person." It is a type of logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the points they are making. This type of argument is considered invalid as it does not directly address the issue at hand.
An ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It involves criticizing the characteristics or circumstances of the individual making the argument rather than the content of the argument itself. This type of fallacy is considered a weak form of argumentation because it does not address the actual logic or evidence presented in the argument.
An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.
New voices vs. tradition Artistic merit vs. popularity
This is referred to as an ad hominem attack (Latin to the man), attempting to invalidate the argument by making charges against the person making the argument.
Tradition vs. diversity,Popularity vs. aesthetic value
white male vs. female minority artistic merit vs. sales
Including a counterclaim in an argumentative research essay strengthens your argument by acknowledging and refuting opposing viewpoints. It shows that you have considered a variety of perspectives and have a strong understanding of the topic, making your argument more persuasive and credible.
A hominem is a Latin term that translates to "against the person." It is often used in the context of logical fallacies, specifically ad hominem attacks, where an argument is directed against a person's character or traits instead of focusing on the actual argument they are making. This type of fallacy is considered weak because it does not address the substance of the argument itself.