Want this question answered?
Because with Britain's strong navy, it could stop Europeans from building new colonies in the Americas.
In the 1880s, the Army had a more successful and influential role in imperialism. The Navy was unsuccessful in its attempts to secure Caribbean coaling stations.ANS 2 - That depends which country you are referring to. During periods of imperialism, the Royal Navy was more infuential.
bigger navy
Athens had a strong navy, while Sparta had a better army
its form of government
The surface navy is the surface ships that make up a strong portion of the navy.
During this phase of the war, both Athens and Eritrea sent a small part of their navy to help the Ionian Greeks. It wasThemistocleswho had encouraged the Athenians to build up their navy for protection. The Athenian navy was strong, with small but fast ships. Their help angered Darius I, who vowed to take revenge on the Greek city-states.So he"encouraged Greece to create a strong navy"
Athens always had a strong navy and they have benefitted their navy because of it's power.
It was the number 1 boost to their navy & army's ego. Although the war with Russia taught them that they didn't necessarily want to fight them again (thus the treaties signed just before WWII). But it was enough success, to show themselves that they could compete with any navy or army.
Strong navy.
Hawaii was in a good location for the US Navy. And some American businessmen wanted the United States to claim the land.
It was the number 1 boost to their navy & army's ego. Although the war with Russia taught them that they didn't necessarily want to fight them again (thus the treaties signed just before WWII). But it was enough success, to show themselves that they could compete with any navy or army.