0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 are they convincing?
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
How did John Rutledge's and Gouverneur Morris' views of slavery differ?
they just were different
John Rawls views his social contract theory as a means of determining?
what is fair and just
What is a no-hitter?
Just what it sounds like. None of the opposing players got a hit. Unlike a perfect game, there can be walks or hit batters.
How did the anti-federalists get the views out to the public?
They were distributed by pamphlets and in newspaper articles, just like the Federalist Papers.
When writing an argument essay it's best to avoid the opposing point of view?
No you should add it just make sure you can counter it. You want to make sure you got every opposing point of view in there and counter it. So there is no doubt that your right about what your talking about.
Why does using evidence help present an argument?
By presenting evidence upfront, you are showing "factual" basis for your argument. Without evidence, to proceed in a case would be like your "word" vs my "word." In Legal matters, there are too many crazies out there just arguing about "opinions" and there are probably zero grounds for the case in the first place.
Why do people tbink abortions are bad?
Because there are two groups of people with opposing views. One group wants to protect the pregnant mother - and says abortion should be performed to save the mother's life. The opposing view is that the life of the developing foetus is just as important - even at the expense of the life of the mother.
What is the meaning of specious?
Presenting a pleasing appearance; pleasing in form or look; showy., Apparently right; superficially fair, just, or correct, but not so in reality; appearing well at first view; plausible; as, specious reasoning; a specious argument.
Professor Schroeder argues that children have an innate concept of justice that enables them to make distinctions between fair and unfair rules This argument is most consistent with the views of?
Professor Schroeder argues that children have an innate concept of justice that enables them to make distinctions between fair and unfair rules. This argument is most consistent with the views of: Plato IS the answer. SOCRATES is NOT the answer. Trust me I just took a test on this and my answer was correct.
What does playing the devil's advocate mean?
Playing the devil's advocate means to take the opposing view point in an argument or discussion regardless of your true opinion. Ex: You make the argument that regular whole milk is better because it is more healthy than chocolate milk, even though you actually like chocolate milk better, just to offer the opposing view point.
Should you respond to possible opposing views when trying to strengthen your positon in a problem-and-solution essay?
Possible opposing views could be beneficially addressed by appropriate handling within an essay, but it is not always essential that this be done.Of course, if it doesn't detract from your main argument(s) too much, there can be merit in also dealing with common or foreseen counter-arguments.However, if too much time is spent on arguing against opposing views, less time remains for you to present your case clearly, soundly, logically and persuasively.If you can present a strong case in your essay, backed up with credible authoritative references and practical examples, it is possible that you would have already convinced your audience/reader that what you have said is worthy of serious consideration, without having to address side issues.Even so, many situations are not always clear cut. In this case you certainly will have to consider (in the essay) all the possible options and viewpoints, and present arguments for and against each one, making logical and progressive summaries as your develop your essay and reach sound conclusions.Sometimes it is possible to quickly dispose of opposing views in your introduction. If this can be done effectively, in a succinct and reasonable way, and if you can create anticipation for what YOU might be offering as a better alternative, then the door is wide open for you to present and develop the suggestions and solutions that YOU wish to present.The danger with even just mentioning opposing views is that, sometimes, your audience/reader will remember thoseviewpoints, as impractical and unreasonable as they might be, and fail to remember the practical, positive and valid strategies that you propose and particularly want your audience to understand, appreciate and implement!
What should you say to a friend who you just got into an argument with?
That depends on what the argument was about
How do you get your way in an argument?
if the argument has already started then stick up for one of the people and start bitching to the other person. if there's no argument then just start bitching to the person you want to have an argument with
What is divergent perspectives?
Basically, its just a different or opposing perspective
What is the origia of the expression 'just for pig iron'?
For no other reason than to add weight to an argument
How do you win an argument with a narcissist?
just dont start it
