answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is an investigation continued after results are accepted?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference repetition and replication of an investigation?

Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.


What is the difference between repetition and replication of an investigation?

Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.


What do scientists do with their results after an investigation?

Results get published.


Why must the results of a scientific investigation be repeatable before they are accepted as true by all scientist?

Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.


What is a valid investigation?

a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.


Why might an investigation continue after its results are accepted?

It is because maybe someone or some group would still like to investigate afterwards to possibly prove the acceptance wrong.


Any method of scientific investigation is accepted on the basis of?

observation


How can you ensure the accuracy of your results which conducting a scientific investigation?

Check if the results are valid


Any method of scientific investigation is accepted on da basis of?

observation


What is the final step of the scientific investigation?

reporting the results


After your investigation you can use the results of your experiments to draw?

conclusion


How do scientists usually communicate and defend the result of an investigation?

How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation