Want this question answered?
observation
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
to orove the hypothesis is correct
An investigation which is conducted under strictly controlled and monitored conditions is likely to result in mor reliable investigations.
Scientific investigation serves several purposes. Namely, it allows for an investigation into a subject in an empirical way. That is, it results in data that can be measured and repeated. Additionally, it serves as a great way of finding out about the world.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
Results get published.
Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
It is because maybe someone or some group would still like to investigate afterwards to possibly prove the acceptance wrong.
observation
Check if the results are valid
observation
reporting the results
conclusion
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation