Because unlike humans, animals find it hard to speak for themselves, they can try to pretect themselves, but a lot of the time humans will win. Humans are more intelligent and sophisticated, but every life is worth something. Animals are an easy target, and they are paying for it. Many humans abuse animals, and thousands of animals die every year, circuses, animal testing and humans kill animals all the time. Baby seal clubbing, whaling, pollution and oil spills are very bad for wildlife. Animals can't stop this, so humans have to, that is why animal rights are important.
This question was phrased such that it asks for opinions.
Opinion #1Animals deserve to be protected from those who would neglect them or deliberately mistreat them. These are not "rights", but a legal requirement for their owners to provide them with proper protection and care.They should have rights.
Opinion #2While animals deserve reasonable protection against abuse, they do not have legal "rights" in the same way humans do. The US courts have upheld the concept that with the granting of rights also comes the responsibility of duties. Since animals cannot reasonably be expected to carry out any duties, they are also accordingly denied rights.This does not give humans any legal standing in cases of abuse. In the same way animals cannot have rights, humans DO have duties and responsibilities. Most US communities do not allow a person to have a poorly kept, extremely unkempt or dangerous residence; similarly, humans are not allowed to abuse animals to the point of starvation, thirst, disease, and/or death.
Cases of alleged abuse are normally handled by local law enforcement with the possible assistance of animal welfare agencies.
Opinion #3Animals should not have Human Rights BEFORE or IF we ever invent a device that can help us communicate with them.YES, of course animal rights are important.I mean would you want to be tortured, poked and hung even though you've done nothing wrong?Animals do not understand these kinds of things, but they have emotins and feelings too, they can feel hunger, thirst, loneliness and pain.Most of the time when we test on animals it is unbeneficial for us! One experiment i know of was tested on rabbits, they were trying to find a cure for stroke, they tested hundreds of medicines on them, out of that only 30 worked and the rest died.When it was tested on humans only 3 worked. ---- NO they are not, they are an indulgence of personal perference but that's it, and no matter how hard you try you will not become an animal, you can be "tortured, poked and hung even though you've done nothing wrong" but not an animal. Here's why:
* 1.3 billion people worldwide depend on animals as a profitable and efficient source of food and income. Poor people or animals? * 800 million people go to bed hungry everyday, grazing animals such as cows are our only way of converting fiber into usagable energy. Hungry people or animals? * Millions of people are still deprived of their basic rights and animal rights activists wish to extend those same rights to animals. Rights for people or animals? * Trillions are invested in livestock related infostructure. * Some pharmaceuticals can only be produced (or produced in sufficient quantities) with animals. Sick people or animals? * Animals cannot understand the concept of rights as they have no morality. * Animals cannot defend their right if granted by humans. * Animals do not have the capacity to corporately maintain rights with humans. * Animals cannot follow rights themselves. * Animals cannot ask for rights or indicate a desire for them. * Countless animals everyday are slaughtered for food or fun by other animals everyday, humans are no different. * Only humans will be affected by animal rights as only humans will obey the law. * The concept of being a heartless person is relative, if i was taught dogs liked being kicked and that it was the right thing to do i would be doing it right now. * Animals rights do not benefit humans in any way, rather it harms humans. * What if an animal loved to be hurt, humans have BDSM and it can be assumed that some animals also do. How can a person decide for the animal? * If full animal rights were granted then all carnivores will have to be locked up for cannibalism. * To what extent is something considered an animal? This is a matter of opinion that only humans can decide on. * What should the rights be for an animal, they obviously are different, should there be different laws for each species? To what extent? How can we tell its the best for them? This is a matter of opinion that only humans can decide on. * I believe most hungry and poor people will shoot you first before they let you do what you want with their cattle. * People are judged on how they treat others, not animals as only other people can comment on your morality.
Animal Rights is the idea that every sentient being deserves equal consideration. That is that animals do not deserve to be treated any lesser than humans. This being said, Animal Rights are important because it gives animals a value. It stops them from being abused, mistreated and also helps us to understand that they are beings just like us.
Three points:
From the above, the question cannot be answered.
It would be logical to conclude that since atheists generally have demonstrated their ability to think problems through and arrive at satisfactory solutions (they became atheists after all) they would examine the question of animal/human interaction in the same way. Their conclusions on each facet of the question would likely be defendable.
Yes they should, they are living creatures just like us human beings. Animals go through abuse, experimentation, testing, and torture and they should be able to have their own rights and live their life's peacefully just like us human beings.
yes it is
Not only to the animals but to us too
its also because they are part of Earth they also help us in many ways
So animals don't go extinct.
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
Civil rights is an important part of a stable economic system.
There is a few animal rights but not a lot!
Singer, actress,dancer, animal rights activist and supporter. Great humanitarian.
Homo sapiens is the only animal which has actual legal rights.
Lawrence Finsen has written: 'The animal rights movement in America' -- subject(s): Animal rights movement, History, animal rights, ethics, philosophy, Animal rights
what are the aims of lush to do with animal rights
Animal Rights Party was created in 2007.
Animal Rights Cambridge was created in 1978.
animal rights activists
In general, the animal rights movement is a social reform movement aimed as having animals viewed as equal to humans. Animal rights advocates generally believe that animals should not be used by humans in any way (even as pets), though there are "animal rights" advocates who do not hold quite that drastic a belief. Some animal rights groups actually believe more in animal welfare than animal rights.
Animal Rights - song - was created on 2010-09-06.