Absolutely. Without the bureaucracy, there would be no institution to carry out the policy that is passed by the legislative and signed into law by the executive branch. The bureaucracy serves an important purpose, no bureaucracy would mean all laws passed would remain an abstraction and not become a reality.
a bureaucracy.
Bureaucracy is always big.
The president is the chief administrator of the federal bureaucracy.
It influences it because the public is an influence to the bureaucracy. You're welcome.
Not
technocrats
Bureaucracy in politics is a system of government in which state officials make important decisions rather then the elected representatives themselves.
The Prime Minister is the most important figure in the Japanese bureaucracy. They oversee the government's operations, set policies, and make decisions on national matters.
Dennis Warwick has written: 'Coal, capital, and culture' -- subject(s): Case studies, History, Miners, Mining districts, Social conditions 'Bureaucracy' -- subject(s): Bureaucracy, Social history
It is important for the federal bureacracy to be neutral with regard to partisan politics because the bureaucracy is expected to do what is in the best interest of the people and the country. Partisan politics gets in the way of that.
Absolutely. Without the bureaucracy, there would be no institution to carry out the policy that is passed by the legislative and signed into law by the executive branch. The bureaucracy serves an important purpose, no bureaucracy would mean all laws passed would remain an abstraction and not become a reality.
R.Burr Litchfield has written: 'Emergence of a bureaucracy' -- subject(s): History
The term "non-characteristic" is meaningless. If the question means to ask "What things are not characteristics of bureaucracies?", then anything other than what a bureaucracy is (organization of government where state officials and agencies process important information) is not a bureaucracy. For example: animals are not bureaucracies. Chieftains and tribal leaders do not have bureaucracies. You cannot eat a bureaucracy, etc.
The most important part of a society is the bureaucracy or structure of a government,
The term "non-characteristic" is meaningless. If the question means to ask "What things are not characteristics of bureaucracies?", then anything other than what a bureaucracy is (organization of government where state officials and agencies process important information) is not a bureaucracy. For example: animals are not bureaucracies. Chieftains and tribal leaders do not have bureaucracies. You cannot eat a bureaucracy, etc.
The most important part of a society is the bureaucracy or structure of a government,