Deleting answers is considered vandalism because if it is a good answer, it should remain on the question, and getting rid of the answer violates the WikiAnswers' Community Guidelines and other rules on WikiAnswers.
In perspective, it is like someone placing a pig near a trough, then someone takes the pig away from the trough, and no other farm animals get to enjoy that pig's company and knowledge when they are near the trough. The person who takes away the pig near the trough didn't do anything to help the community, but rather hindered the community by taking away the pig. Therefore, deleting answers isn't just considered vandalism, it is vandalism.
They can, but they don't have the ability to do reverts and block or warn users. It would also seem suspicious if someone was constantly deleting answers. If an answer is inappropriate, by all means please remove it. But don't forget to report it to a supervisor, or to post in the community forum in the 'Report vandalism and abuse' sub-forum.
No.
A supervisor who is deleting legitimate answers and reversing the grammatical question can be reported to the Community Advisor.
WikiAnswers feels very strongly against vandalism. Vandalism is cause for warning, and possibly blocking, whether temporary or permanent. Vandalism ruins the site for all the legitimate users that are interested in some answers. If vandalism is found, please click 'Report Abuse' in the top right hand corner of a question. You may also post in the 'Report Vandalism and Abuse' forum.
There are many good answers on wikianswers. Unfortunately, as with any public wiki site, there is a risk of vandalism and unintentional wrong answers.
Some questions attract vandalism, when people change good answers to nonsense. Therefore, those answers are 'locked'.
There is no policy against posting wrong answers if you do so in good faith. If you deliberately post wrong answers or blank good answers, then that is considered vandalism and dealt with according to the Community Guidelines and Terms of Useof this site. Such changes will be fixed or reverted, and the contributor could face warnings, with multiple infractions leading up to a block from participating.
You usually don't have to sign in to answer. Most of the vandalism of empty pages comes from unregistered users. You do have to sign into the site to edit answers or add more information. Requiring the user to be logged in to edit helps reduce vandalism of established answers.
It can be a felony offense. It depends on premeditation and dollar damages.
In my opinion, it is considered vandalism. So that's why I think it is considered illegal. I personally love it!
DingoBot is our Vandalism & Spam robot who flags answers not questions.
There is no limit to how many questions someone can ask or answer. But they must be real answers without nonsense & or profanity, etc. Any existing valid answers must remain. Deleting nonsense is ok, deleting good answers not only impolite but not allowed . For opinion questions that can have multiple correct answers, just add new under existing. have at it.