0
Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms is a fact and is only controversial among a vanishingly few ideologues and practically no scientists. The theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by over 95% of all scientists and is not controversial among the scientific community because it has been observed and tested for 150 years. There are some religious ideologues who can not accept the evidences that refute their creation story, so they make evolutionary theory only controversial politically.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was wrong with lamarck's theory of evolution'?
His two main concepts, acquired characteristics and a innate " desire " to evolve, were both unsupported by any evidence and were not the way evolution happens. So, Lamarck's " theory " ( in the vulgar sense ) was utterly refuted by the actual evidence and process of evolution.
What are the evolution of public administration in Nigeria?
Discuss the evolution of public administration
How do you explain in brief the evolution of computer?
explain in brief the evolution of the computer
What dose evolution mean?
evolution means a progressive growth stating from a pint to a large structure.
How much does trials evolution cost?
I have no idea, im so sorry, I didnt mean to disapoint you like this man, oh god i am sorry.
How did people started?
A controversal question indeed. There are multiple answers out there, depending on what you believe in. Creationism and evolution theory are possibly the two most famous ones.
Why was Darwin's theory of evolution controversal?
Because it contradicted the Church. The Church thought that God created animals, plants and human. Darwin scientifically proved that life may have appeared without the intervention of God.
Why is evolution controversal?
Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms is a fact and is only controversial among a vanishingly few ideologues and practically no scientists. The theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by over 95% of all scientists and is not controversial among the scientific community because it has been observed and tested for 150 years. There are some religious ideologues who can not accept the evidences that refute their creation story, so they make evolutionary theory only controversial politically.
Why was the terrorist banned?
it is not banned it is controversal because it is not school compliant
What current areas of scientific research are controversial?
Stem cell research is very controversal currently in America. The CERN Particle accelerator which is studying quantum particles is also controversal due to experimenting with the unknown and what some people think could be the consequences of their research (such as forming a black hole). Genetic engineering and gene screening of embryos are also controversal.
Is Christianity a controversal religion?
No it is a very simple religion o understand and follow.
Why was kansas-Nebraska Act controversal?
Because it made it possible that new slave-states could get voted in by the local population. So the South was delighted, but the Abolitionists were horrified.
Who are the people study about evolution?
Biologists, paleontologists, geneticists, and anthropologists are some of the scientists who study evolution. They analyze fossils, genetic data, and comparative anatomy to understand how species evolved over time. The theory of evolution was proposed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century, and his ideas laid the foundation for the study of evolution.
Why are gm crops controversial?
Because some people do not agree with GM crops and it can cause controversal
Why was Sharon Stone's roll in Basic Instinct so controversial?
Sharon stone's role in basic instinct was so controversal because of the overt sexualty scenes and the deception of violence. It was also strongly opposed by gay right activists.
Can there be evolution without reproduction?
No. Evolution is defined, in its simplest form, as descent with modification. So reproduction is an essential part of the definition of evolution.
Is similarities an early development not evidence for evolution?
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
