Hunting is now more than just killing for food. Many hunters hunt to get a trophy or for the fun of it, whereas farming is about growing and raising crops and livestock, respectively, to sell to people as food. However, hunting is better than farming in terms of environmental benefits because it poses a lesser impact than even the most sustainable kind of farming does, especially in terms of hunting animals for food and nothing else.
hunting
Farming is often more efficient and reliable than hunting and gathering as it allows for larger and more predictable food yields. It also enables people to stay in one location, leading to the development of more complex societies and civilizations. Additionally, farming allows for the domestication and breeding of plants and animals, which can be tailored to specific needs and preferences.
Farming and herding allowed for a more reliable and abundant food supply compared to hunting and gathering. They also facilitated the development of settled communities and civilizations due to the ability to produce surplus food. Additionally, farming and herding provided a more efficient use of resources and enabled a larger population to be supported.
It was (farming) a more reliable and stable food source than hunting/gathering.
If it was would we be using modern farming?
Better weather for farming.
Farming and medicine along with predicting the furture
farming made hunting and were able to settle down they started improving there lives like building permenat shelters and making better weaponds
Was farming or hunting easier in the region of Mesopotamia? Explain.
The opposite of farming (agriculture) would be hunting or foraging.
The biggest advantage of farming and herding over hunting and gathering as a way of life is that it is controlled. These methods of food gathering are more dependable than hunting and gathering.
better farming than the south