Want this question answered?
In truth, it is meant to slow the process of change down. It helps to have two different legislative bodies consider legislation in an effort to weigh the rights of the people against the rights of the individual needs of the varied states. In a modern society with the current technology it is likely that only Nebraska got it right.
The law would be invalidated based n the preemption doctrine.
The likely word is "representatives" (officials of a legislature, or agents).
Babylonian elections
William Few believed that having state legislatures elect representatives to the national legislature would help maintain a balance of power between the states and the federal government. He believed that state legislatures were more likely to choose representatives who would prioritize the interests of their respective states, rather than being influenced by national political parties or other external factors.
Democracy has never really existed, in he sense of people having proper control of their lives.
It depends on the specific state's constitution. Many states have two houses in the legislature as in the US Congress (a state senate and a state house of representatives).
bicameral legislature has many advantages particulary in large nations. in the USA for example there 50 states now states with large population like California ,Texas and New York dominate the house of Rep. In the Senate each state has 2 Sen which makes it possible for Each state to have a equal say in national affairs.
In the South American region most likely since North Americans have the most growth in democracy.
it happens in a democracy
I would say not really. But the bad democracy can progress where as the military rule will most likely become a terrible dictatorship and the democracy would (obviously) be better. This is my opinion.
in what type of situation would your state be most likely to need federal protection Against domestic violence