Want this question answered?
Not necessary, it depend on the designed plant size. Nuclear power plant can be as small as few hundred watts to Gigawatts of electricity capacity.
i think it is better because geothermal energy help people with a lot of things and coal doesn't because its bad.
it has the potential to, but at present there is not enough geothermal plants to do so.
The first use of geothermal energy occurred more than 10,000 years ago in North America by American Paleo-Indians.
no because it is in the ground
Solar energy is certainly safer than nuclear energy, but decidedly more expensive with much greater space requirements...at this time. As solar and other alternative energy sources are developed, it is reasonable to assume that the costs will decrease. Whether or not they will ever decrease to the costs per kilowatt hour that nuclear energy can achieve remains to be seen.
Less than 0.05% of american's energy is geothermal
Yes, geothermal energy is more expensive than hydro power
Not necessary, it depend on the designed plant size. Nuclear power plant can be as small as few hundred watts to Gigawatts of electricity capacity.
Since hydropower involves the direct change of stored potential kinetic energy into electricity, rather than requiring going through a thermal transfer stage (i.e. heat->kinetic->electric vs kinetic->electric) as in nuclear or geothermal, the "efficiency" of a hydropower plant is certainly higher than a nuclear or geothermal plant. In terms of energy produced per unit of input source (i.e. fuel - water in the case of hydro, steam in the case of geothermal, and fissionable fuel in the case of nuclear), nuclear wins by a massive margin (on the order of millions of times more efficient).
Wind and geothermal will never run out, but they will not supply the world's demands either. It's not clear how long petroleum will last, more is still being discovered. Uranium will last until the end of this century, at least.
i think it is better because geothermal energy help people with a lot of things and coal doesn't because its bad.
yes i believe that nuclear energy is cheaper than others
The difference between Fusion and Fission is that Fission is easier to do and produces more energy than fusion reactions. However fission can be dangerous and is used in Nuclear reactors. Fusion however is safer and produces less energy but safely. It is quite difficult to cause a Fusion reaction however.
it has the potential to, but at present there is not enough geothermal plants to do so.
There is very little pollution at all.
The first use of geothermal energy occurred more than 10,000 years ago in North America by American Paleo-Indians.