answersLogoWhite

0

We cannot identify a person specifically with hair alone. Even if their is mtDNA, it isn't good enough-DNA is class evidence anyway.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is the shaft of the hair is consider class evidence in a trial true or false?

True. The shaft of the hair can be considered class evidence in a trial because it can potentially link a hair sample to a particular group of individuals based on characteristics like color and texture. However, it does not provide definitive individual identification since many people can share similar hair traits. For more conclusive evidence, the root of the hair, which can contain DNA, would be necessary.


How is hair a class evidence?

Hair can be considered class evidence because it shares characteristics with a group of individuals but does not provide specific identification to a single person. Important characteristics like hair color, texture, and length can be used to narrow down potential sources, but further individualization usually requires DNA analysis or comparison to specific known samples.


When is hair considered direct evidence?

Hair is considered direct evidence when it can be definitively linked to a specific individual through DNA analysis. This typically requires a root or follicle attached to the hair shaft for successful identification.


How can something be both types of class and individual evidence?

Something can be both types of evidence if it possesses characteristics that can be attributed to a group or class of items, as well as unique characteristics that differentiate it from others within that group. For example, a blue cotton fiber found at a crime scene might be considered class evidence because blue cotton fibers are common, but if there are unique qualities, such as a specific dye pattern, it could also be considered individual evidence.


How is a fingerprint class evidence?

A fingerprint is considered class evidence because it can be categorized based on pattern type (loop, whorl, arch) and general characteristics (ridge endings, bifurcations). Class evidence can narrow down a group of individuals who share similar characteristics but cannot definitively identify a single person.


Why hair is considered to be circumstantial evidence and not as positive a means of identifying a suspect as fingerprints are?

Hair does not have unique characteristics like fingerprints do. While it can provide important information such as DNA analysis, hair evidence alone is not as definitive for identification purposes because multiple individuals can have similar hair characteristics.


Is blood considered class evidence if so why?

Yes, blood is considered class evidence because it does not have characteristics that are unique to a single individual. Blood can be classified based on blood type and other genetic markers, but it cannot definitively link to a specific individual without additional DNA analysis.


Is a comb a class 3 lever?

Yes, a comb is considered a class 3 lever because the effort is applied between the fulcrum (pivot point) and the load (hair being combed).


Why is hair used as evidence?

Hair can be used for a DNA profile.


What class is an tampering with physical evidence in Texas?

class 3


Is paranormal evidence considered scientific evidence?

No. It is not.


When is evidence considered scientific?

when the evidence is relatable