We cannot identify a person specifically with hair alone. Even if their is mtDNA, it isn't good enough-DNA is class evidence anyway.
Hair can be considered class evidence because it shares characteristics with a group of individuals but does not provide specific identification to a single person. Important characteristics like hair color, texture, and length can be used to narrow down potential sources, but further individualization usually requires DNA analysis or comparison to specific known samples.
Sheep belong to the Animalia kingdom, the chordata phylum, and the Mammalia class. Sheep are considered domesticated animals and are kept as livestock.
The oldest bird fossil Archaeopteryx is a transitional form between reptiles and birds and is cited as evidence Describe three additional pieces of evidence for this claim?
Hair contains DNA. It can be examined in a lab to possibly discover who it belongs to, or at least biological information about them. It can help to quickly narrow down the pool of suspects.
Bats belong to the class Mammalia because they are warm-blooded, have fur or hair, give birth to live young, and produce milk to feed their offspring. Additionally, they have a backbone and are equipped with specialized teeth for chewing and grinding food.
Hair can be considered class evidence because it shares characteristics with a group of individuals but does not provide specific identification to a single person. Important characteristics like hair color, texture, and length can be used to narrow down potential sources, but further individualization usually requires DNA analysis or comparison to specific known samples.
Hair is considered direct evidence when it can be definitively linked to a specific individual through DNA analysis. This typically requires a root or follicle attached to the hair shaft for successful identification.
Something can be both types of evidence if it possesses characteristics that can be attributed to a group or class of items, as well as unique characteristics that differentiate it from others within that group. For example, a blue cotton fiber found at a crime scene might be considered class evidence because blue cotton fibers are common, but if there are unique qualities, such as a specific dye pattern, it could also be considered individual evidence.
A fingerprint is considered class evidence because it can be categorized based on pattern type (loop, whorl, arch) and general characteristics (ridge endings, bifurcations). Class evidence can narrow down a group of individuals who share similar characteristics but cannot definitively identify a single person.
Hair does not have unique characteristics like fingerprints do. While it can provide important information such as DNA analysis, hair evidence alone is not as definitive for identification purposes because multiple individuals can have similar hair characteristics.
Yes, blood is considered class evidence because it does not have characteristics that are unique to a single individual. Blood can be classified based on blood type and other genetic markers, but it cannot definitively link to a specific individual without additional DNA analysis.
Yes, a comb is considered a class 3 lever because the effort is applied between the fulcrum (pivot point) and the load (hair being combed).
Hair can be used for a DNA profile.
class 3
when the evidence is relatable
No. It is not.
why is a warranty considered a class of insurance