Almost every culture has a different name for the animals present. The use of a scientific name that is both constant throughout languages and cultures and describes such an organism's evolutionary characteristics is an elegant solution.
no
I've never seen an advantage. They always seem to get into arguments with each other.
Scientific names are specific to each type of organism that they describe, thus there is no scientific name to classify all 'oil seeds'.
It gives each different type of organism just one scientific name
A complex organism is classified as an organism that has multiple cells with each having its own function. Examples of complex organisms are plants, humans, and animals.
Less Competition for Food
The first name in a scientific name represents the organism's genus, which groups together species that are closely related. This is followed by the species name, giving each organism a unique two-part name, known as the binomial nomenclature.
I'm definitely not going to give you the record of the entire taxonomic tree of life, that would take ages. I can tell you that the "Scientific name" for a 'scientific name' is Binomial nomenclature.
They are having a competition
binomial nomenclature the 1st part of the name is genus the second part is species
It's Scientific name can be understood by anyone, instead of in that language. For example, Americans can call a ribbon fish Ribbon fish or Lepturacanthus Sava. Italians can call the ribbon fish pesci del nastro or Lepturacanthus Sava.
It gives each different type of organism just one scientific name