0
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
What else can I help you with?
Is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
Scientific inquiry is a process with many paths
What is a rigid sequence of steps?
im not quite sure but i know it has to do with the process of scientific inquiry.
Why is scientific inquiry a process with paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is a scientific inquiry a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific inquiry process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why scientific inquiry a process with many path not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Can scientific inquiry be a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
Science has always been a flexible multipath process. Scientific discoveries quite frequently happen when least expected and not being looked for. Serendipity is essential to progress in the field of science and getting stuck on a fixed sequence usually blinds the observer from making such discoveries. Many new discoveries were overlooked by scientists that were overly rigid and the results discarded, only to be rediscovered later by other scientists not so blindered by their formal procedures and rigid expectations. Whatever gave you the idea that science is rigid and inflexible?
Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of paths?
The short answer is that a rigid process for inquiry is the scientific equivalent of dogma, encoding a bias that implies an inequality of hypotheses (and people) that is contradictory to the scientific method. This results not in standardization and improved trust, but in eroding trust and periodic fragmentation. We do actually already have such constraints on the inquiry process in the form of funding, religious, moral and legal constraints, which are completely appropriate given that Science is intentionally rational, apathetic towards emotion, and amoral. However even though we do have these constraints, and because we don't have a common base for religion, morality, or legality, they already have since the beginning been causing the fragmentation spoken of above; the more rigid and detached from the consumers of the science the constraints on inquiry become, the faster and more antagonistic the fragmenting gets. There's a lot more detail, these are the essentials.
What happens to all the points in a rigid body when it rotates about a fixed axis?
When a rigid body rotates about a fixed axis, all the points in the body move in circular paths around that axis.
Which sequence of rigid transformations will map the preimage ΔABC onto image ΔABC?
The identity transformation.
What is rigid and flexible constitution?
rigid constitution are those constitution that can not be changed why FLEXIBLE constitution are constitution that can be changed through a process of amendment
