0
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
What else can I help you with?
Is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
Scientific inquiry is a process with many paths
Why is a scientific inquiry a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific inquiry process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why scientific inquiry a process with many path not a rigid sequence of steps?
It is because according to the process , scientific inquiry is a process with many steps because each step occurs to the scientist and if you just skip a step there would be no steps to scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry wouldn't exist in your world without paths to follow just like if your friends weren't with you on the bus, it would rather be you would a random person sitting next to you. So your friend wouldn't exist.
Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of paths?
The short answer is that a rigid process for inquiry is the scientific equivalent of dogma, encoding a bias that implies an inequality of hypotheses (and people) that is contradictory to the scientific method. This results not in standardization and improved trust, but in eroding trust and periodic fragmentation. We do actually already have such constraints on the inquiry process in the form of funding, religious, moral and legal constraints, which are completely appropriate given that Science is intentionally rational, apathetic towards emotion, and amoral. However even though we do have these constraints, and because we don't have a common base for religion, morality, or legality, they already have since the beginning been causing the fragmentation spoken of above; the more rigid and detached from the consumers of the science the constraints on inquiry become, the faster and more antagonistic the fragmenting gets. There's a lot more detail, these are the essentials.
Can scientific inquiry be a process with many paths not rigid sequence of steps?
Science has always been a flexible multipath process. Scientific discoveries quite frequently happen when least expected and not being looked for. Serendipity is essential to progress in the field of science and getting stuck on a fixed sequence usually blinds the observer from making such discoveries. Many new discoveries were overlooked by scientists that were overly rigid and the results discarded, only to be rediscovered later by other scientists not so blindered by their formal procedures and rigid expectations. Whatever gave you the idea that science is rigid and inflexible?
Which pair of ideas were central to scientific revolution?
The central pair of ideas in the Scientific Revolution were empiricism, which emphasized the importance of direct observation and experimentation in forming scientific knowledge, and the heliocentric model of the universe, which proposed that the Earth and other planets revolved around the Sun. These concepts challenged traditional views rooted in religious and philosophical beliefs, paving the way for a new era of scientific inquiry and discovery.
How did thinkers of the renaissance and the enlightenment differ in their beliefs about faith and reaon?
Thinkers of the Renaissance tended to emphasize a balance between faith and reason, seeing them as complementary paths to truth. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers prioritized reason over faith, promoting the idea that human reason and scientific inquiry were the most reliable paths to knowledge and progress.
Which property will you use to process different server paths in a page?
Server
What color process uses a prism to split up the spectrum of light into three distinct paths?
Diffusion.
