0
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detectives?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Many sources that historians use are not as reliable as those used by a detective. They have to compile different sources from the same era to determine their accuracy.
Jose Luettgen
Historians deal with sources that may be biased, incomplete, or contradictory, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Detectives, on the other hand, usually work with more concrete evidence in criminal investigations. Historians must critically analyze their sources and consider multiple perspectives to interpret the past accurately.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Why were bronze tools better than those made of stone?
Bronze tools were better than stone tools because bronze is harder, more durable, and holds a sharper edge. This made them more effective for cutting, shaping, and striking objects, giving them a longer lifespan and making them more efficient for various tasks.
The historian is more concerned with the interpretation than the accuracy of the data?
Historians prioritize analyzing and interpreting historical data to understand its significance and meaning, rather than focusing solely on its accuracy. Interpretation allows historians to uncover complexities, patterns, and context within the data, offering insights into the past that go beyond simple facts. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of historical events and their lasting impact.
Report on the archaeology and literacy sources of medieval history?
Archaeological sources for medieval history include artifacts such as coins, pottery, weapons, and buildings which provide insight into daily life, trade, and technological advancements. Literary sources like chronicles, letters, and manuscripts offer information on political events, religious beliefs, and societal norms of the time period, often reflecting biases or agendas of the writers. Combining information from both types of sources provides a comprehensive understanding of medieval societies and cultures.
Why were the tools of the Bronze Age stronger than those of earlier timesus anything?
Tools of the Bronze Age were stronger because they were made from bronze, a metal alloy of copper and tin, which is harder and more durable than the materials used in earlier tools. This made bronze tools more effective for cutting, shaping, and building, leading to advancements in agriculture, construction, and warfare during that period.
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detective?
Historians often deal with incomplete, biased, or conflicting sources, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Unlike detectives who may have access to physical evidence, historians must interpret and analyze historical documents to construct their understanding of the past. Additionally, historical sources may be limited by the perspectives or agendas of their creators, requiring historians to critically evaluate their reliability.
Why are hoaxes harder to pull off today than in the past?
People have access to other sources of information to check the facts.
Is slate harder than shale?
No. Slate is harder. Slate is shale that has been heated and compressed.
Is chalk harder than limestone?
No, Limestone is harder than chalk.
Is enamel harder than a diamond?
No, diamond is harder than enamel.
Is emerald harder than diamond?
No. Diamond is harder than emerald.
Are rocks harder than teeth?
no, teeth are harder than rocks
If event is historian than what is a place?
explorer
What is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid?
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
What is harder to do on the moon than on earth?
It is harder to walk on moon than on earth
Is diamond harder than a metal?
Yes, harder than any metal.
When was Harder Than the Best created?
Harder Than the Best was created in 1979.
