Many people do not agree that it is more ethical to do so, claiming that every living thing has a right to its natural life.
The only possible explanation is that creatures like rabbits, mice and other "lowly" animals need to be used so that medical experiments on humans don't need to take place.
That beggars the question, "Is a human more important than a dog in the scheme of things?"
You will have to answer that question for yourself.
humans ears are more sensitive because animals have super hearing
We are not considered animals - we are animals, and our closest relatives are apes.Actually , it depends on your thinking .Chimpanzis are the ancestors of humans ,.And on other side ,Humans Have Developed their brains more than Animals .That's Why they r ruling the world with their Intelligent Minds .
Yes, there are way more animals than humans. There are even more ants in the world than humans.yes
Heritability is the likelihood of different traits being passed down in a species. It is more difficult to estimate in humans than in livestock or laboratory animals because humans are less controlled. Humans will interbreed among races and cultures, while animals generally keep to their own type.
The animals are more realistically drawn than the humans.
Omnivores are animals that eat both plants and other animals but when it comes to humans it should be more carefully defined as animals that have the natural capability to eat plants and other animals. When animals other than humans have this natural capability, they use it. However, humans are sentient and can choose for themselves. Therefore, even if humans have the natural capability, they can choose not to use it because of religious or ethical beliefs.
Because the ethical guidelines for experimentation on humans is extremely complicated. It is easier for researchers to use animals because you don't need an animals consent and its more acceptable to risk the life of an animal then a person.
Because it is believed that a human life is more important than an animal's life. People don't think of animals feeling pain, testing on humans seems worse than testing on animals. Most of the products are tested on on humans after they have been tested on animals.
Neither is more important than another because animals have a different genetic makeup than humans so in the end most tests that are successful on animals are not successful on humans. For example, penicillin kills guinea pigs and has no effect on rabbits
humans ears are more sensitive because animals have super hearing
Animals reproduce much faster than humans and have more children at one time.
There are more animals than there are humans, but the overall total is constantly changing.
Yes. But technically, humans are animals.
Well that is a personal opinion question but most likely animals, since they can not tell anyone if they are hurt or what hurts if someone figures out if they are hurting. Also testing on animals is a lot less ethical due to the small confinement and crowded conditions.
The animals are more realistically drawn than the humans.
The animals are more realistically drawn than the humans.
The animals are more realistically drawn than the humans.