answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It has not reached carrying Capacity

User Avatar

Noble Bogan

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

No. Natural selection is the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators. The random variation part could be thought of as mutation and recombination that the non-randompart, natural selection, works with.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Well, all natural processes have an element of chance, of course. But natural selection, deterministic as it is, is much less random than, for instance, genetic mutation. Which is why we generally distinguish between the randomness of genetic variation and the non-randomness of the filtering process that is natural selection.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would natural selection not occur in population?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why would natural selection not occur in this poplutation?

What population? Perhaps you mean if there were no variation for natural selection to select from.


Why would natural selection not occur in this population?

The population has not yet reached the carrying capacity.-apex :D


A small number of finches live in a protected bird area. They are given as much food as they need and have plenty of space. Why would natural selection not occur in this population?

There is no need for it to occur. Only if the environment changes and less food is found would there be a change. The environment selects the birds that do the best under the new conditions and the others will die.


Why must there be variation in a population in order for natural selection to occur?

What would there be to select from if all the organisms in a population were not different in morphology and behavior. Some of these differences are reproductively successful against the immediate environment, and that environment is the natural selector.


If a population consists only of individuals cloned from a single organism then a Lamarck was right about species change for that populaiton b natural selection would not occur in that population?

Neither. Lamarckian evolution does not take place at all; almost all of his concepts are now known to be incorrect. The population will still undergo mutation, and natural selection for beneficial mutations and against harmful ones will still occur.


Why are variations in a species needed for natural selection to occur?

What would be selected if organisms did not have differences that lead to better survival and reproduction, or the opposite. That is all natural selection is.


What characteristic within populations cause natural selection to occur?

Genetic variation. If there were no variation in the genes/phenotype then natural selection would have nothing to select from.


What would be the consequences for evolution if there were no reproductive variation?

There would be no adaptive change due to natural selection and only genetic drift due to random events and gene flow due to population mixing would occur. Alleles would change, but without reproductive variation speciation could not occur.


What best explains a natural selection in a antelope population?

How it changes in response to its environment.


The highest rate of natural selection would probably occur when?

This would occur when organisms showing many genetic differences caused by mutations and genetic recombination reproduce in a changing environment.


Which is more likely to be true natural selection or evolution?

Evolution, of course. Evolution can happen without natural selection in some cases; drift, flow. Generally though, natural selection causes evolution and then, by definition, would come first.


Why would natural selection not occur without genetic variations on species?

Without variation it would not be selecting, just random death of identical units.