Yes, it is because the photograph was there during the time it was happening
the person that took or is in the photograph was there
Unless the photo has been "touched up" or was made using "trick Photography", it records what actually happened at the time it was taken.
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.
Yes, a photograph of a riot can be considered a primary source as it provides direct visual evidence of the event. It captures the scene as it unfolded and can serve as an authentic record of the riot.
yes it is a primary source
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
A primary source might be a letter, photograph, or speech that
A source directly from an event. An autobiography, Photograph, interview YOU did, are all primary sources.
If the source is primary or secondary and what type of source it is (i.e. video, photograph, etc.)
Usually refers to a primary source such as a journal, photograph, letter, etc.
A primary source would be something like a diary, or a photograph. Primary sources are sources that came directly from the time period they are describing.
A photo taken at the time of the event. (Apex)
Email can be considered a primary source depending on the context. If the email contains original information or firsthand accounts of events, it is often considered a primary source. However, if the email is forwarding information from another source, it may not be considered a primary source.