Generally, creating a hypothesis is a no-win situation. The hypothesis you devise must be provable false. Your data will either prove your hypothesis false or it will fail to prove the hypothesis false. You can never prove a proper hypothesis true. Science does not prove truth, it simply discards the false.
Because they know if there experiment doesn't work then they know not to make the same mistake again.
create another one
A better explanation might exist.
False.
At a certain point it needs to be testable or it's just wrong
in the scientific method the hypothesis is always assumed correct until proven wrong by the experiment that is being performed
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
the Flat Earth Hypothesis was proven wrong by satellites taking pictures from space
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
create another one
A better explanation might exist.
False.
In science terms, a hypothesis can only be proven "not wrong". The way it works is that scientists, including the one who stated the hypothesis, try their hardest to demonstrate that the given hypothesis is wrong. If they are successful, then the hypothesis is discarded. If, after many tries, no one can prove the hypothesis is wrong, then it might attain the glorious status of a Theory. As an example, look at the hypothesis of global warming. Almost everyone is running around trying to prove it correct. There are very few following the true scientific process of trying to prove it wrong.
At a certain point it needs to be testable or it's just wrong
Then your just proven wrong thats all. A hypothesis is not meant to be exactly right. Its more of a chance thing. if its right then your right, if its wrong then its back to the drawing board
in the scientific method the hypothesis is always assumed correct until proven wrong by the experiment that is being performed
It's not that it's not correct, it was that the experiment proved it wrong. And it is helpful because it tells the scientist that their idea was incorrect do to speak and that the experiment proved it. You can still write a very good report if the hypothesis was proven wrong
It must be proven from right to wrong