0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were shell keep castles built?
They were built because the stone used was stronger than wood and was hard to destruct
Why were later castles built using stone?
It was stronger the wood
What is stronger wood or metal?
no wood is not stronger than steel. yes becasue steel is stronger than wood.
What is stronger ash wood or maple wood?
Maple is stronger than ash. Ash is still a very durable floor.
Why does wood float but stone sink?
First, the stone sinks because of the weight, the wood would probably be much lighter than the stone.Second, the density. The stone is much more dense than the wood
How were motte and bailey castles improved?
Motte and Bailey castles could have been improved by making them bigger and stronger. In fact, they did improve Motte and Bailey castles to make them bigger and stronger. To make them stronger, they made them out of stone. These castles were called Stone Keep castles (Stone castles). Also, they were much bigger. Stone Keep castles still stand today because stone doesn't rot within a few years but will last for centuries. None of the Motte and Bailey castles still stand today because they were made out of wood and would have rotted within a few years. they would rot because wood is crap
Why is some wood stronger than others?
Wood from trees that grow faster is usually weaker than wood from slower growing trees.
Which is stronger a shield made of stone or a shield made of wood covered in leather?
Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.Well a shield made of stone obviously would be stronger than a shield made of wood covered leather, but who in the heck would be able to use one? The man had to "wield his shield" which entailed moving it around and even butting with it. A stone shield would not be practical unless it were something fixed such as a wall and not something carried by a soldier.
Are bamboo wood floors stronger than other wood?
There are many advantages of having bamboo wood floors and there are some disadvantages. There is no actual test proving that bamboo wood floors are better or stronger than wood floors. It really just depends on your personal preference.
How did the materials castles were made out of change?
Norman castles changed from Motte and Bailey castles which were made out of wood to Stone Keep castles made out of stone. They changed the castles in this way because of these reasons: * Stones stronger than wood * Stone, unlike wood, doesn't burn * Wood rots withing a few years but Stone will last for centuries * Stone Keep castles had higher up walls meaning that attackers couldn't fire arrows at them * Stone Keep castles had really tall towers that the defenders of the castles could easily fire off, but there's no way that the attackers would be able to fire up at them
Which material is used for packing which is cheaper and stronger than wood?
plastic
Is Microlam stronger than lumber?
Yes, The multiple layers of wood glued together makes them 50x stronger than standard lumber.
