The alternatives are either annihilation (possibly mutual) or taking to the hills to carry on guerrilla combat, perhaps for years.
Wars are definitely not a good way to end conflict. Because, in wars many innocent people die. Also, so-many resources are wasted.
Wars are definitely not a good way to end conflict. Because, in wars many innocent people die. Also, so-many resources are wasted.
The reason World War 2 had to end the way it did was because there was no other way to end the war. So many people were being killed and neither side would serrender.
It was the beginning of the end for Imperialism, which may be regarded as good by some. It also led to improvements in aviation, communication, etc.
To end the war.
No it's the other way around
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.
You could start a war poem with sound effects that you might hear at war, or you could ask a question about war, and then end the poem with with the answer, or state a random fact about war, but still might capture the readers attention. Hope this helps!
a good way to end a coke speech is theres alot of coke products but coca-cola is a cassic
The same way it did for adults.
Railroads, I believe.
Because that was the only way to end the war.