Intel Celeron (not Celluron) isn't per se considered useless. It is a quality processor, though there are (generally speaking) better processors available.
It would depend on your requirements, as to whether AMD or Intel are superior. Generally speaking most experts consider Intel to be the superior of the two.
It has to produce something, otherwise it is an useless machine.
The Intel P4 line is considered obsolete and won't be the best choice for renderng.
In many ways the AMD processor is considered to be significantly better than the Intel. Intel is attempting to improve their image by adding new features, and AMD is doing much the same.
ski boots, because they are useless with the skis
it provided no means of enforcing the "no war" agreement
Men MIGHT have gotten paid IF they were in the army. Women, no, they were considered useless.
Intel 4004
Intel 8088 Intel 8086 Intel 286 Intel 386 Intel 486 Intel Pentium Intel Pentium II Intel Pentium III Intel Pentium IV Intel Itanium Motorola 6800 Zilog Z80
Intel celeron is the lowest processor Intel offers. Below is the list from best to worst: Intel core i7 Intel core i5 Intel core 2 quad Intel core 2 duo Intel core 2 solo Intel pentium Intel celeron For laptops: Intel core i7 Intel core 2 extreme Intel core 2 quad Intel core 2 duo Intel centrino Intel pentium Intel celeron
Blanking is the act of a user deleting a good answer, and replacing it with false/useless information.
Useless