0
That is a logical contradiction. It is impossible to be both erroneous and without error at the same time. A better question would be "Why is The Bible erroneous, isn't it supposed to be without error?" The answer to that question is that the Bible was written by mortal men, not an omniscient deity.
What else can I help you with?
Is the Bible considered infallible or inerrant by most Christian theologians?
Most Christian theologians consider the Bible to be both infallible and inerrant, meaning that it is without error and completely trustworthy in all matters of faith and practice.
Define accuracy and precision?
Accuracy and precision are synonyms. They both mean without error, they are exactly right, No more and no less.
Is it right to say erroneous mistake?
Yes, it's technically correct to say "erroneous mistake," but it's considered redundant since "erroneous" already means incorrect or mistaken. A more concise phrase would simply be "mistake." Using both terms together can make writing less clear, so it's generally better to choose one or the other.
Error is serious Sampling error or non sampling error?
Both. But sampling error can be reduced through better design.Both. But sampling error can be reduced through better design.Both. But sampling error can be reduced through better design.Both. But sampling error can be reduced through better design.
Can it be correct to capitalize both Study and Bible in Study Bible?
absolutely
Can you reverse a wire transfer?
Usually No. There are exceptions when a wire transfer can be reversed, in the event of a fraud or erroneous transfer, and provided the money on the recipient side has not been disbursed. In this case, both would have to agree that the transaction was a fraudulent (or in error) and it will be reversed, minus any charges, etc. that may have occurred on the transaction network (e.g. SWIFT, etc.)
What are examples of invincibly erroneous conscience?
Invincibly erroneous conscience refers to a situation where a person is sincerely mistaken about moral principles and cannot be reasonably expected to recognize their error. Examples include a person who believes that a certain harmful act is morally permissible due to cultural or religious teachings, or someone who is misinformed about the consequences of their actions and genuinely believes they are doing the right thing. In both cases, despite their incorrect beliefs, they are not culpable for their actions because they cannot recognize the truth due to lack of knowledge or understanding.
What isBible in the French language?
In French, the bible is le bible. It is the same word in both languages.
How does the foot relate to the Bible?
They are both amazing and functioning. The Bible is more amazing, though.
Who was peter and Andrew related to in the Bible?
In the Bible both Peter and Andrew were real brothers.
What does lamech do in history of the Bible?
Lamech was the the first polygamist mentioned in the Bible. He killed both of his wives.
What is the difference between Jerusalem Bible and Community Bible?
Roman Catholic AnswerThe Jerusalem Bible, and The New Jersusalem Bible, are both Catholic Bibles with copious notes, both introductory and footnotes all of which are approved by the Church both with a Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur. (The Nilhil Obstat and Imprimatur are a declaration that a book or pamphlet is considered to be free from doctrinal or moral error. It is not implied that those who have granted the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur agree with the contents, opinions or statements expressed.) The translation itself is from the original languages, and, for the most part, is exellent. There have been criticisms of the original Jerusalem Bible following the French translation a little too closely. This was corrected in the The New Jerusalem Bible. It is an excellent study Bible, and considered good enough that at one time, it was approved as an alternative to be used for the readings at Mass.I can not find Community Bible, although I do see a series of books on Amazon that are called The Community Study Series (for the Bible). This seems to be an Protestant interpretration of the Bible, and thus rather misleading. I would not recommend any Bible or study series that did not have a Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur.
