They are afraid of labeling them because the public is starting to get afraid of the affects of GM foods on their bodies. Labeling them would make the public aware, and since a huge percentage of American foods contain GMOs, businesses could lose tons of money.
No, because the biotech wants to keep the recipe they use to make GMOs a secret from the public.
because of the way the foods are produced it allows them to buy more of it in bulk
No, they do not. There are no laws that protect consumers if they do not want to eat GMOs. The consumers' only choice if they wish to avoid eating GMOs is to stop eating lots of foods that may contain GMOs.
GMOs (genetically modified food) may create allergies.
I just wrote an article that talks about GMOs. The GMO rice, called golden rice, is described under the section "GMOs Can Improve Nutrition."
We can only guess at what their motives are, but considering that it is estimated that 70% of the processed foods in grocery stores contain GMOs and the reaction that Europe had to GMO foods, it is reasonable to believe that they oppose labeling because they fear that labeling GMOs would severely hurt their sales.
No, because the biotech wants to keep the recipe they use to make GMOs a secret from the public.
Regulation of food began as early as the 1800s and food labeling regulation arose out of that. Recently, requiring GMOs to be labeled has been a major debate, mostly between consumers and companies who produce GMOs, food companies, and grocers. To this date, GMO ingredients are not required to be listed on food labels.
because of the way the foods are produced it allows them to buy more of it in bulk
Religion doesn't appear to have a role in the GMO controversy. The issues appear to be possible improprieties in regulation of crops and foods containing GMOs, safety issues that have not been addressed to the satisfaction of those who oppose GMOs, and people wanting GMO foods labeled so they can choose whether or not to buy and consume them. The labeling issue has been the most publicized, and the issue there is not banning GMOs, but people wanting the right to know what the foods they consume are made from.
Labeling is attaching a small piece of paper, fabric, plastic, or similar material to an object and giving information about it. The term labeling is often used in reference to food products, specifically in the debate of whether or not foods that contain GMOs should specifically state that on their labels.
There is no known information that indicates GMOs are easier to grown than non-GMOs.
There is no evidence that GMOs have improved food production.
yes because then people would freak out in what were eating, and also they might have posioinous food
in the United States GMO foods are not labeled. Some foods that do not contain GMOs are voluntarily labeled, often with the Non GMO Project label. Due to cross contamination, even foods with the Non GMO Project label may not be totally free of GMOs. Foods in the UK that contain GMOs are labeled.
No, they do not. There are no laws that protect consumers if they do not want to eat GMOs. The consumers' only choice if they wish to avoid eating GMOs is to stop eating lots of foods that may contain GMOs.
Companies are concerned that if GMO foods are labeled, consumers would not buy them. Since 70% of all processed foods sold in grocery stores contain GMOs (is probably higher today), that is a large amount of profits that could be lost.